52 things bout me-its shitty and not deep im just bored

May 04, 2005 00:52

If you ever pondered the question...what is Julia all about (which you probably havent) here is it in 52 steps ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

redhandeddenyal May 4 2005, 12:34:54 UTC
Julia's my favorite.

Reply


theuprisal May 4 2005, 12:42:44 UTC
Impressive, Impressive.

Reply


queenofengland7 May 4 2005, 17:29:20 UTC
Wow. I don't even know where to start, so I'm just going to say wow. Wow.

Reply


REESE'S hotsextony May 4 2005, 18:34:03 UTC
Beside the factr that i am currently flipping ou whlie writing this post
REESE'S ROCK
some people are way too obsessive about pregnancy its overrated
#46 some be the motto for the chi town crew
i love abs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bithces rock on in a funky ska kinda way!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Re: REESE'S hotsextony May 4 2005, 19:03:06 UTC
shit nigga the question isnt what is julia about it's, what ISN'T julia about. That what we gotta understand man, to unlock the awesome psuedo-complexity-ultramega-spiffy-ska-spectactular-most-bitchen-ass-hard-ass-core-crazy-artist-motherfucker-alive-in-st.louis julia
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!
suburban legend gummi bears rule!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Re: REESE'S theuprisal May 5 2005, 12:45:52 UTC
...Tony, bro, let me put it to you this way-

YOU.
ARE.
WHITE.

...and have wayyyy too much coffee lol

Reply


pseudosexy May 5 2005, 16:40:03 UTC
Crying is weakness. It is the acceptance of defeat. It is an act, a proclaimation, the epitamy of helplessness. It is also useless; crying serves absolutely no function towards a goal. It takes an irrational person, a victim of inconfidence, someone who has sacrificed themselves to the whim of everything else but their own desires, to cry over anything. What's the use? It only proves to others and is acceptance to oneself that one is worth-less.

And anyone who believes someone crying is a bat-signal for their altuistic "humane" shoulder, helper, hand-lent to the self-defeated is only nurturing, catering to, proliferating the irrationality that is destroying our world. They are sacrificing themselves (the most horrific, ignoble act) irrationally to the irrational and thus only piling two more bodies on the pit pyre of humanity instead of standing tall on the highest peak.

Reply

yep 5ftandgrowing May 5 2005, 16:52:17 UTC
thats what i think but it sounds harsh so most assume its a bad way to think of it.

Reply

Re: yep pseudosexy May 5 2005, 23:44:23 UTC
"Harsh" only leads back to the issue of insecurity. If someone's hurt by anything written above, it's no fault of mine. They're the one who has sacrificed themselves yet again to being hurt. They've chosen to become vulnerable and believe themselves to have been hurt (though this is self-injury, I had nothing to do with it) by reality.

I shouldn't cater to someone's insecurity for reason's stated above. They have nothing to do with me.

As well, it's not "a bad way to think of it," it is reality. Either you perceive (5 senses), think (judgement), and act (works towards goals) within reality or you hand over your life (in its entirety) to mysticism, wishful thinking, and destructive behavior. One concession to giving up your judgement (man's only tool) negates all other acts. In other words, you don't exist.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up