(no subject)
DONT SAY I DIDN'T WARN YOU!
Boys got cooties, Girls got the brains
We got the boobies so we win the game
We hear you knockin'...
But you cant come in.
We're in our nighties and they're awfully thin!
We love to party but we know it's a sin
Aw hell honey, come on in!
.....its so true isn't it?....
Everything in the world has become so sex-obsessed. Dont get me wrong, I am one of the many included in this crude guilted party, yet I cant help but notice ...
The world has become two-tiered ... or tounge-tied perhaps?
we have the age of the sexually-free - "hey its out bodies! we love our bodies! we'll do what they hell we want with them with who the hell we want - it's completely natural!"
oh yes ... the booming rates of AIDS, Clamydia, Herpes and other delightful diseases, they would have risen to the substantial rate they are at now anyway right? wrong you cum-slutted hippy ... thats what protection is for. I'm sure the unhappy bastard children of today are blaming mother nature for the fact that they have been created by two people who are definately not in love, doubted that they even have mutual respect for each other, they just wanted to do what was "natural" after a night out. Oh yes ... you poor child, blame mother nature, after all she she MUST be the unfit "mother" here ... not the fact that the womb in which you unwantingly entered this world from didnt know how to keep her underwear on and "daddy" didnt understand the use of a condom.
Then we have the up-standing, law-abiding, never-had-a-good-fucking kinda people with their side of things, who consequently argue "men want nothing to do but have sex, that's all they care about and woman today are cheapening themselves and giving out all manner of obscenities from blowjobs to tittie-fucks in order to have sex with aforemention men"
ok, first I would like to point out that TO AN EXTENT (and god help me if anycunt says I'm contradicting myself I will kick them in the teeth) A VERY CERTAIN EXTENT sex is natural, not to sleep around with any tom dick or harry (or tina, diane or harriet in order to be politically correct in this sexually-orientared time) but there is a desire to reproduce, but should it not be with someone you love? There are those out there that believe, hands down, pre-marital sex is wrong. I dont. But lets pretend to share their view for a second, it IS in the bible and those who are catholic are supposed to abide by the bibe, albeit not alot of them do, especially on this front but that is generally the idea, it also IS romantic to "save yourself" for the man/woman you marry. But what I want to know is - save yourself from what? if your careful and NOT just blatantly sleeping around then their should be no need to worry about STI's and pregnancy - sex can just be a pleasant experience. If you truly love someone it should not matter what their sexual background is, but - and dear god is this apparent - you cannot shift some people from their beliefs.
And I will be the first to admit that can be a great thing. But in this stance, it certainly isnt.
We have the cum-slutted hippies on one hand "fighting", or more appropriately fucking for the rights to do what they damn well please with their bodies against the upstanding, law-abiding, never-had-a-good-fucking argument of others who (and I can sympathise on this level with them) are seen to have old-fashioned views and aren't acknowledged in todays modern society.
Both are right, and both are completely wrong ... but here's were we come back to people are adamant to stick to their views; both are taking it to an unecessary extreme - and an all-time low.
You know that I'm the first one to bitch about how women can't make up their minds about what they want from men -- why, we claim to want sensitive, nice guys and then the "sexually-free" are throwing themselves at the first obscene drooling neanderthals that come along, right infront of their sensitive nice-guy friends.
Their view is: If some of the more conservative member of society has the nerve to try and break ranks and spout of some puritan line, we gag them, tie them up somewhere out of sight and say unison "Dont mind them ladies. He was just joking when he called you sluts. We think your lovely, gracious and you honour us with your company.Hooray for girls who want to fuck, just to fuck."
It is not uncommon to hear conservative members quoting the bible about how pre-marital sex is wrong however ... according to the bible itself, when a man and woman have sex, they become as one, and thats as good as marriage in Gods eyes, apparently. This is why a couple (at least by Classical Jewish standards) weren't actually considered married, despite the seremony until they had consumated this holy bond on their wedding night. This can also have a downfall as they teach their children that sex is a sin unless it is within marriage - they are taught what NOT to do so that their virginal daughters do not fall pregnant and so their pure sons are not seduced by evil females and their womanly wiles... they are taught sex is wrong. and it isn't, why do they only teach about preganancy, STI's and how to stick a condom on a bannanna - its only through learning that the youth can actually gain enough intellect to decide their sexual future for themselves - god forbid they have their own mind and even, perhaps, their own body.
I have tried to be as fair as possible in this probably non-coherant rant of mine but all in all everyone is sex-obsessed. Either for it or against it. There are so many mixed signals out there and it can only lead to one outcome ...
In our next generation, half the population will be providing the baby boom for generations to come whilst the other half with sit in their pews and pray for their filthy souls.
....and no-one wants that to happen....