Child porn = Harry Potter? NO-NO!

Aug 08, 2007 16:35

Well, I’ve just come back to LJ and I’m a bit… dumbfounded about their new policy regarding child porn and how it has affected our HP fandom. While I’m pretty sure the 99,99999% of people find child porn aberrant, (I’m myself included, of course), to consider *any* drawing of fictional people (as any HP character) under 18 years old in a sexual ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 5

su_chan August 8 2007, 15:57:58 UTC
Bienvenida de vuelta y gran post has escrito ^_______^

Reply

_noesumeragi_ August 8 2007, 16:31:17 UTC
aqui estamos peleandonos con el english XD 1 abrazo!!!

Reply


matyas_adina August 8 2007, 20:22:06 UTC
That's right, seems a bit silly, with this strictly-over-18 rule. I think LJ wants to be completely law-compatible, so they even count fictional characters as living ones. It stupid, but we will manage I think. I suppose after this fuss goes down, everything will be back to nornal.

It's great to have someone to know and understand about slash. My love is also a slasher, and we got to know each other thanks to Snape and Sirius. :P I still trying to show my gratitude to them with my arts.

Reply

_noesumeragi_ August 9 2007, 19:54:31 UTC
hhehehe, yes, at fist I was a bit embarrassed, but then, I was "outed" by a friend who found a slashy story in my old web. Everybody though it was pretty cool, lol... (starting by this friend)

Reply


a_blue_moon_cat December 23 2007, 11:13:21 UTC
Yes, LJ under the rule of 6Apart, went very strange on us. :( It's been a bit sad, to say the least.

At any rate, I once was deidrecorwyn, and we were mutual friends. I am now
a_blue_moon_cat and when I applied the rename token, LJ went wonky on me and I lost all my mutual friends. I am still a friend of yours, but I will need you to please friend me back! Thanks in advance. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up