...

Aug 10, 2004 21:41

i'm bored...

prove:

n! <= [ (n+1)/2 ]^n ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

nikrm August 10 2004, 16:53:31 UTC
wait I think that doesn't really work, it works for 1 but 2 doesn't work...maybe I'm reading it wrong. in which case I should have made this an anonymous comment

Reply

jenskate1 August 10 2004, 18:44:58 UTC
i think that works for 2.

i think:

2 is less than or equal to (3/2)^2
so 2 is less than 9/4

which is true.

right?

Reply

_seekup_ August 10 2004, 21:20:58 UTC
yeah, i also forgot to mention for n > 0

Reply

nikrm August 10 2004, 22:06:42 UTC
rofl! I thot that <= was like some backwards implies hahaha

Reply


virtu August 11 2004, 19:40:23 UTC
omg Kevin you need to watch HINDI MOVIES. *dies from awesomeness* best stuff EVER.

Reply

_seekup_ August 12 2004, 21:09:37 UTC
lol hindi movies whatr those? indian or something? (not to be racist)

gertrude. hehe

Reply

virtu August 13 2004, 13:27:04 UTC
yes they're indian movies :P they're insanely funny and dramatic and definitely the feel-good type o movie :D i think you'd like 'em considering you like love actually + assorted romantic comedies.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up