I've heard the argument of "post-abortion syndrome" in the past, and wondered if it was still being used. It's particularly interesting in light of the
most recent look into the supposed affliction.
Were there any prolifers here who used this as an argument against abortion? Does this change any minds?
Comments 32
It's no reason to discourage either practice.
Reply
Reply
oh and the whole "BC causes abortions" discussion. the pill prevents ovulation and implantation. pregnancy begins at implantation, not conception. so BC cannot abort a pregnancy, being that pregnancies don't begin until the zygote has implanted itself in the uterus.
Reply
Reply
So, no matter what you do, there are consequences. And the only person who can weigh those to be worth it or not is the person to whom the situation is happening.
Reply
Leave a comment