Click to view
So here in abstractthought, there have been plenty of discussions about the cosmos, conceptions of God, reason, paradoxes, etc. While many [of you] might regard the Adam and Eve narrative as a story that is totally incompatible with logic and reason, I beg to differ! That is not to say the story operates on logical principles; much of it deals
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
It is written in the Talmud (which is basically the cliffnotes of the Torah) that God took eve from adam's rib. not from the head to be superior or from the feet to be walked upon, but from the side to be equal, from under the arm to be protected, and from next to the heart to be loved."
it's one of my favorite passages.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Personally, one of the key reasons I avoid the organized religions in their modern manifestations is precisely because of the recent dominance of literal interpretation. To me, it seems obvious that the Bible, Talmud, or Quran-- or any other religious text, Buddhist sutras, etc-- are not literal history but myths, a symbolic interpretation of history or even fictional stories meant to explain the "big questions" and the mores of modern society (or at least the society in which they were written). I actually quite enjoy reading religious texts as allegory or metaphor and to search for meaning that will resonate with me personally-- but may not align with the dominant interpretation. And since I'm by no means a scholar of religious texts or ancient Near Eastern languages, I particularly appreciated the insights prompted by your translations ( ... )
Reply
I too am not a monotheist, but I like to view the character of God in the story as the Unknown or even the personification of a pantheistic divine portrayed in a drama (or myth, I should say). At least, this is how it has more meaning for me.
Reply
Leave a comment