(Untitled)

Apr 11, 2005 22:06



Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

persiancowboy April 11 2005, 21:52:35 UTC
The problem is that Sudan doesn't have any oil or any silve or gold or etc. So we can't go there and spend all the tax payers money and don't bring back anything for our bussinesses which provide good high paying jobs for our youth. Think more and be wise. Jimmy Carter is a old man know and can't do anything. Clinton is more republican and conservative than W. You don't see him that always hangs out with older Bush and his buddies. He even did'n't support Kerry in the campaign and said that I am sick and I should rest. Look at the background and think open mindedly. Then you get the idea and everything. However I bet you will end up confused about everything

Reply


adalicia April 12 2005, 06:06:41 UTC
no, I completely understand, and already knew, that we weren't going to go help them because they have no capital goods that we could get as a form of "payment" for sending our troops in to destroy the terrible acts of genocide that are going on. Then again, maybe if there weren't as many troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kuwait, it wouldn't be as big of a deal to send troops, because it would basically just be the same in the end. I am a very open minded person, and have past since acknowledged that Clinton is more conservative these days. Conservatism usually comes with age. I just don't like the fact that a vow was made by a US president of the past, and the US president of the present isn't holding up his end to keep that legacy and vow alive and true. I acknowledge that we can't always help everyone, it's out of our means... I'm just unhappy with it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up