Leave a comment

Comments 13

cookie_simone October 28 2009, 07:38:54 UTC
Unrelatedly; you guys know the esteem in which I hold Zach Quinto, but I'm sorry, the man should never be allowed on set in his own wardrobe again. LMAO, no one of the characters he's supposed to be playing would dress like that. XDLOLOL. I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that. And it wasn't just the hat! It was the stripey shirt, too! Apparently, amnesiac!Sylathan = Zachary Quinto. Except more into the ladies ( ... )

Reply


ialwayswill October 28 2009, 07:57:54 UTC
SYLAR MADE ME LAUGH A LOT

WHEN HE IMITATED MOHINDER "MY FATHER'S RESEARCH" I WAS DYING OF LULZ

AND OMG POOR JEREMY. WHAT A HORRIBLE WAY TO DIE. :(
THE ENDING WAS THE BEST PART. VENGEFUL!SAMUEL IS AWESOME.

Reply

adeline November 2 2009, 21:39:57 UTC
Sorry for the replying fail!

Samuel is all sorts of bad-ass and wonderful, omfg. It scares me how EASILY he could get me to join his skeevy carnival, lmao.

Reply


decadentdream October 28 2009, 08:09:34 UTC
Jeremy <\3 I loved him last time and was SO excited to see him this time. And that whole last scene of his with Gill was just... poetic? Not sure if that's the word I'm looking for, but it was just extremely symbolic and hit all the right notes for me. *sigh* As much as I hate the loss it was a character death that actually meant something ( ... )

Reply

adeline October 29 2009, 09:41:29 UTC
I'd describe Jeremy's last scene as TRAUMATIC, personally. It was so impactful, horrible and sad. :( And you're right, it meant something, it was relevant and consequential. Not pointless like so many before.

Sylar and Matt have been so OOC, lol. Sylar was alright this week but Matt is off the frakking rails. *facepalm* LOL, I think "my father's research" was such a hit with the internet fanbase, they thought they'd throw us a bone here, too. XD

I liked Tracy as well! Not that I've actively disliked her much, but she's so boring most of the time... Not this week! I really enjoyed her interactions with Bennet, Samuel and Jeremy.

I didn't even think of Nathan TBH I keep thinking of him politically instead of legally so... if it had been Peter I might have thought of it heh :$Ah, come on, he tried to take down Linderman by getting the FBI involved and was constantly worried what would happen if the world at large ever found out about people with abilities. (Yes, I shall forever champion him, my hero! ♥ lmao) And I have to point out ( ... )

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

adeline October 29 2009, 09:12:39 UTC
Hee! I'm not sure it was that one exactly, but it must have at least in part been inspired by it. And there's no doubt Zach has been wearing his own clothes in the carnival scenes for the past 2 episodes, LOL. ♥

Reply


canadian_turtle November 2 2009, 19:02:28 UTC
Pfft, even Matt has not the slightest clue. (I wonder if he knows at all of Molly's whereabouts.)
Then again... Matt's not the brightest bulb in the chandelier, lol

I'm also glad (and frankly, impressed) that their relationship didn't take center-stage and become the sole focal point of all of their scenes. I like that.
Ditto. It's much less 'sensational' and much more real. I am liking it.

I still don't get how Tracy can live without taking an interest in her actual biological ORPHANED NEPHEW
Because she's a cold hard bitch? *cue JET song to start*

When Niki Tracy was brought to the carnival and the camera did that neat swivel-round thing, I couldn't help but think about Peter's utter(ly adorable) fascination with pretty lights. He would be so happy at the carnival, lols. ♥
EL OH EL! Like a little kid in a candy store.

Reply

adeline November 2 2009, 21:35:06 UTC
lolol, that's right, Matt's always been a nugget short of a Happy Meal. XD

much less 'sensational' and much more real

Exactly! ♥

Because she's a cold hard bitch?

lmao, I didn't want to be the one to say it, but probably, yeah. And you know how, originally, people's abilities were supposedly linked with their personalities? This would certainly fit here. ;)

Haha, Peter is so childlike still. Kid in a candy store is totally a valid comparison.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up