i found the anti-christ. his name is dan eberly

Apr 28, 2006 22:35

the TEXT message conversation with dan.... let's see if i get into trouble for this. =rolls eyes ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

darilyn April 29 2006, 04:24:43 UTC
The only way he can make himself feel better is by manipulating people and turning them against one another because he is a loser w/ no direction in his life and everybody knows that. That's why he sponges off people. That's all he's good for.

So "everyone Ed knows" that hate you mean... him? See, that's just it. In his own little world, he is everyone.

Expunging that disease is the best thing I've done for myself.

Reply

adownwardhaul April 29 2006, 04:33:45 UTC
i've come to realize that he's just like every other man that has come into my life; a liar and a manipulator [save ed]. the only difference now is that i have the option to never see or speak to him again. and i think that i might just do that.

the unfortunate thing is that i just spent the last 2 years sticking up for him and giving him advice and you know, generally being a good friend. and now, all that's wasted. that's what i get for investing time into people.

Reply

darilyn April 29 2006, 13:33:11 UTC
I think w/ things between him & Victoria being not great (that was my impression lately, anyway), he has to strike out at anyone he can before he's pushed aside once again. Unfortunately, he's targetting you this time.

Learn to ignore him; he'll move on to harassing someone else and making their lives miserable.

Reply

adownwardhaul April 29 2006, 17:30:37 UTC
it's unfortunate that he had to strike out at the one person that was willing to help him.

whatever.... i deleted his number from my phone, i'm debating deleting the text messages.... i should. they're just wasting space, and i have them posted on livejournal anyways... in case i ever need them for some reason.... =rolls eyes=

Reply


authorityone April 30 2006, 16:33:50 UTC
I'm not looking for trouble, and I am not involved in this discussion, and that is the point of what I am about to say. I'm a little confused as to why, after he called you an attention whore and gossiper, that you would post the entire convo he had with you. I mean, isn't that what he accused you of in the first place, telling people things they really didn't need to be involved in? I understand that Live Journal is supposed to be a journal, but yeah, its public. Don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm just pointing out an observation.
And I am not saying this out of a defense for Dan, it would be pointless for me to defend him on LJ anyhow, but it just seems like you went and did exactly what he accused you of. And as far as Vic goes, I would talk to her, I spent 12 hours with the both of them yesterday and if you want to know what she feels about the whole thing, and even this post that you did, I would ask her.

Reply

adownwardhaul April 30 2006, 17:29:40 UTC
"I'm a little confused as to why, [...] you would post the entire convo he had with you. I mean, isn't that what he accused you of in the first place, telling people things they really didn't need to be involved in?[...] Don't get me wrong, I'm not accusing you of anything, I'm just pointing out an observation ( ... )

Reply

authorityone April 30 2006, 21:30:32 UTC
I agree with you on a lot of what you said, but let me clear something up. I have no idea what was or was not said about Vic, what you confirmed or didn't, what the deal with "J" is, or anything in regards to that post as I was not involved in any of it. I'm not accusing you of telling anyone anything about dan or vic or "j" or anything. So in regards to you asking if I would prefer that you lied, no I wouldn't, and I don't even know what it would be that you would be lying about in the first place. As far as the hate thing, yeah I don't hate you and enjoy hanging out with you and Ed. Ed did irritate me as far as making plans with Dan and I and planning a large part of what we were going to do and then canceling without calling (until I texted him) long after he was supposed to call, and cancelling because he said he needed to get stuff done, which he apparently didn't realise when he made the plans less than two days earlier, then after he cancelled went out anyway with other people and his only reason was that they called later in ( ... )

Reply

adownwardhaul May 1 2006, 03:37:47 UTC
granted, because dan wouldn't really listen to my side of the story and take that the "something confirmed" was what they already knew... and i said "something was wrong" (the detail stoppped at "something,") he WOULD have had a right to be pissed. unfortunately, he didn't care, he was already pissed off at the notion of whatever i MIGHT have done.
and, i really don't think that ANYONE deserves the malice which dan shot out of his mouth, regardless. i just wish that he had a little more tact.

Reply


honesty vixenisthedevil May 1 2006, 04:00:08 UTC
Okay ( ... )

Reply

Re: honesty authorityone May 1 2006, 21:36:02 UTC
Hey! I think there was a little mis-understanding, again, lol. When I read this post originally I did not know what either thing discussed in the text message was in reference to. It wasn't until later in the day that I found out from Dan and Vic that I already knew the thing with Vic and they told me just enough about "J" to show why it would be so bad for Krystian to be telling "everyone" or anyone who didn't need to know, about it. In regards to me after that point still saying I didn't really know anything about either situation, I meant that I didn't know about what Krystian may have or may not have been telling in regards to those situations, not that I didnt have an idea about what the situations were. I did know what Dan and Vic told me they thought was going on, but not what Krystian may or may not have actually did. I hope that made sense!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up