In response to Tre's comment on my last entry

Oct 26, 2005 17:25

Quote, Tre ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

anonymous October 26 2005, 16:53:02 UTC
I was lurking around Squirrel's friends list and saw this interesting post. Allow me to comment on it briefly.

You say that if someone is not aborted, they can go on and do miraculous things? But what if it's the opposite: they go on and do horrible things? Like Osama and Saddam and all those people... did you know that Hitler's mother actually considered an abortion? Just imagine what the world would be like if she went through... granted, there's always a possibility that things could be worse, but let's not go there. Just wanted to bring up another POV.

Reply

aelita101001 October 27 2005, 13:54:59 UTC
hm, you have a good point mysterious person with no name! But, isn't that the parent's job to keep their kid in line and prevent them from doing horrible things? it's shown that if a kid acts well in his or her childhood (by force or not) they usually lead better and more productive lives.

Reply


cheese_pinwheel October 26 2005, 20:45:54 UTC
I'm not going to curse whilst around you, Megan. I know you don't appreciate those kinds of things. I think it's great that you're working to change people's minds about that. More people should do that. I wish more people would respect the fact that God gave us free choice though.

Reply

aelita101001 October 27 2005, 13:58:41 UTC
*hugs Tre* i know that, i was talking about some other people...>.> and i appreciate you accepting my dislike for that and not cursing around me. ^____^

true, that would be really great if more people would recognize that, though it could also be argued that we have the choice to not respect freedom of choice. that's what hitler and a bunch of other people thoughout history have done, and look at the wars we've caused though it!

Reply


grandmasterrach October 27 2005, 08:53:01 UTC
We need cancer to kill people off, Megan. The human race is doomed anyways, we don't need people living longer fuller lives...we're already overpopulated as it is, and over half of them are idiots.

Think of it as voulintary population control.
I'm against killing something that doesn't stand a fighting chance, but I'm also afraid of what they might become.
I cannot control the masses...and I will find a method of birth-control if I am refused my future perscription.

Jon's going to have to let me see the world before I have a kid. Xp

Reply

aelita101001 October 27 2005, 14:02:02 UTC
LOL i don't blame you, i'd like to do some things before having my first child.

And i agree that we're overpopulated, but shouldn't the idiots have cancer instead of the intelligent people? It strikes people at random and kills if not treated, that's my only major problem with cancer. as for voluntairy population control...wouldn't voulentary mean submitting yourself along with hundreds of people for mass genocide? nah, i'll pass thanks. ^^;

and you'll probably be denied if you don't have a good reason for it. >.>

Reply

grandmasterrach October 28 2005, 14:02:48 UTC
Actually, they're working on a law where the Pharmasist (spelling, I know. Xp) could refuse to give you birthcontrol based on their beliefs.
D00d, if that happens, millions will start cutting their ovaries out and having abortions all the time if they can't use medication to prevent the eggs form being fertilized in the first place. -_-;

Reply

aelita101001 October 28 2005, 14:15:48 UTC
YOU'RE KIDDING??? dang, i'm sorry but that's not right. based on what beliefs, biases? so a Nazi pharmacist (my spelling's not that great either) could refuse such birth controls to say, jews? or a white pharmacist not giving a black girl birthcontrol? gah...outrageous i say! some birthcontrols are used for the exact OPPOSITE reasons...(don't ask me how i know, you'll get fwaped)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up