(Untitled)

Jan 31, 2008 01:01

The first person to correctly guess why I dislike this piece gets a cookie.

Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 177

aberrant_scion January 31 2008, 09:38:16 UTC
A creature of power sealed in a meaningless casing, drowning in chemicals, decaying...

A shallow examination of life and death and look at it-suspended in DEATH~!

Wake him up wake him up

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 14:59:41 UTC
10 points for effort, but do try again.

[Screened to OU!B]
...Wake him up?

Reply

[Screened to AU!L] aberrant_scion January 31 2008, 17:49:08 UTC
Effort in what?

I DO NOT LIKE THAT PICTURE, TAKE IT AWAY!

He's cold, always too cold.

Reply

[Screened to OU!B] agentlibre January 31 2008, 17:51:38 UTC
I liked your guess. Thank you for trying.

...Is he a) with you, and b) conscious?

Reply


princessmamoru January 31 2008, 11:05:47 UTC
.....

It's all wrong. Symbolically, artistically and rationally such a construct cannot and possibly should not exist in an ideally rational, law-bound world, even as an abstract.

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:01:53 UTC
It does exist. Did exist. What does that tell you about the rationality and lawfulness of the world?

Reply

princessmamoru January 31 2008, 17:41:41 UTC
Oh, of course it did exist, but the meaning of its existance could be interpreted in many different ways, and not all of them by the intent of the creator. It is designed to make people question but obviously not everyone will, or if they do not everyone will get the correct answer.

It tells you, well, it tells me that rationality and lawfulness can be altered and changed. Truth is tangible and should not always be trusted since everyone's definition is different and even if this is THE truth - with every symbolism that might be behind it - even stating the blatantly obvious the creator must know that people will simply ignore it's meanings in favor of their own perceptions. Hence, it is "wrong" and in an "ideal" world it cannot exist and should not exist because there would be no need for it to exist if truth was not so tangible at will.

Much like the Bible and all the stuff Americans sometimes argue about with the length of a day and such, if I make any sense whatsoever.

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 17:43:03 UTC
...Shark = truth?

Reply


neuroticsand January 31 2008, 12:04:58 UTC
What kind of cookie?

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:02:32 UTC
One equal in value to the eloquence of your correct answer.

Reply

neuroticsand January 31 2008, 16:23:10 UTC
The accuracy. I imagine it a little unsettling.

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 16:25:47 UTC
Hm? Fair is fair.

Did you have an answer to share?

Reply


thieveryofstars January 31 2008, 14:43:53 UTC
Cookie cookie cookie I wanna cookie! :)

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:03:04 UTC
I would be happy to oblige. Your guess?

Reply

thieveryofstars January 31 2008, 15:03:47 UTC
Huh? What guess? Guess what?

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:07:34 UTC
1 cookie for 1 correct answer. Did you notice the image I posted?

Reply


explosivenature January 31 2008, 15:13:56 UTC
I´ll trade the prospect of a cookie for one hint.

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:16:43 UTC
What kind of trade is that?

No deal.

[OOC: Strikes typed then deleted.]

Reply

explosivenature January 31 2008, 15:17:35 UTC
That´s cold.

Reply

agentlibre January 31 2008, 15:21:15 UTC
That's my job.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up