Latest Rankings

[apperception]

Objective Rankings of LJ "Philosophers"

Comments

[jeffrock]

tee hee

[apperception]

May's Burger King

[jeffrock]

"By the way, my specific position is against an empiricism/rationalism distinction, so it isn't empiricist. It is only 'empiricist' in the sense that it isn't...rationalism."

Let me see, he rejects an empiricist/rationalist disctinction but admits that his position is only empiricist in the sense that it isn't rationalism. Interesting.

Ok. I know we have had our share of differences (though I know well enough from the time when we "got along" or so to speak that we have more in common than is presently evident). I will accept that my stance on something serves as a sort of "litmus test" indicator that you will probably reject it or find it ridiculous. I will consent that I have been out of line with you in some of our past discussions. I will even consent that many of my positions are "spooky", "flakey", "mystical", "questionable" and "weird". However, I challenge you to find anywhere in my writings evidence of such a profound degree of arrogance, philosophical incompetence and outright stupidity as catachrestic has been displaying in real_philosophy

[apperception]

The really important question is: Which category does he belong in?

[unnamed525]

Well, shit, by your classification, we're on the same damn side.

[apperception]

is theah a pubic heah in mah coca-cola??

[unnamed525]

I was no where near New Jersey, so I couldn't have tea bagged your Coke ... it must have been mendaciloquent.