(Untitled)

[alexfoxkit]

Comments

[alexfoxkit]

They're like a level 60 with all epics

[alexfoxkit]

which i also might add, makes pvp annoying at 60.

It's kinda like rouges at level 29 in BG

[nekomikey]

and the Shaman is forgotten. That is how underpowered we are... Weeeeee

[alexfoxkit]

procmachine w/buffs and totems!

Thrall is a Shaman,so they're bound to be bad-ass!

[alfador_fox]

Druids are fun to play in my opinion... yes, we're a jack of all trades and master of none... but that also means that we have fewer skills for any given role.

Sure, fewer skills means fewer options--but that also means it's easier to master the subset. And it's easier to switch gears into another form and mindset to do, say, healing, than it is to have all those options at once and hesitate a crucial second.

It's way more fun for me to be able to do melee dps, tank, or heal, (and once dual specs come in I'll be able to do the latter with better than pathetic efficiency) than to have just one role and one only, like a rogue.

[alexfoxkit]

Fewer skillz means less versatility, but means higher simplicity.

A mage is ridiculously over complicated for example, and can kick major ass but learning to master that is the most difficult part.

[squnq]

anyone who says any particular class sucks is a bad player and needs to reroll or maybe try playing a different and less-challenging game such as mario brothers or perhaps pong

[alexfoxkit]

you can't beat mario bros!

[squnq]

[squnq]

also you only get sapped if you're a dummy and just rush in blindly / stand around idly. there is a reason DKs have death and decay which is otherwise worthless in PVP.

and you have druids mixed up, druids are the better single-target tank, not multi-target. trees are not fragile, they are a pain in the ass to kill in BGs.

[squnq]

DKs always have trouble taking down trees in BGs, I just strangulate them and stay on them so they can't hot other people