Comments | alivejournal: New Test Release

grahams in alivejournal

New Test Release

Oct 29, 2001 23:22

For those of you interested in using AliveJournal with servers other than livejournal.com, check out this test release and let me know how it works for you...

Go to the File->Settings from the login box and change the server name to your preferred server... It defaults to www.livejournal.com, but www.deadjournal.com works like a champ (for me).

( Read more... )

Comments 8

symtrax October 31 2001, 16:15:23 UTC

Works fine on my local LJ server, woot. Thanks. ;)

thehangedman November 2 2001, 14:18:28 UTC

Going to the account manager kills the program, pretty much like it used to do.

suppafly January 25 2002, 22:37:57 UTC

does it work with bone?

Re: ahhhh grahams January 25 2002, 23:19:33 UTC

All those problems with the last version were caused by me compiling everything under BONE as opposed to net_server... That is why it worked for a handful of people (those with BONE) and no-one else.

The latest released version works fine for me under both net_server and BONE. The same should be true for everyone..

Re: ahhhh suppafly January 25 2002, 23:33:17 UTC

:( died on r5.1/Dano .. have you tested it on that version of bone yet?

loading symbols
segment violation occurred
gen_ms:
gen_ms:
+002d ec073ead: * 3e seg %ds
AliveJournal:sc
frame retaddr
fcffbff4 8001175f LJApplication::DoLogin(void) + 00000cf3
fcffc0d8 8001060e LJApplication::MessageReceived(BMessage *) + 000000ea
fcffc0fc ec17bbe6 BLooper::DispatchMessage(BMessage *, BHandler *) + 00000076
fcffc114 ec171d01 BApplication::DispatchMessage(BMessage *, BHandler *) + 000007c5
fcffc338 ec17b6fa BLooper::task_looper(void) + 000002a6
fcffc5d8 ec16fc7d BApplication::Run(void) + 00000061
fcffc5ec 8000f8c4 main + 00000064
fcffc604 8000f745 _start + 00000061
AliveJournal:

Re: ahhhh grahams January 25 2002, 23:40:20 UTC

I haven't tried it, nor do I know when I will try it under Dano... I don't know how interested I am in making my application work under such a dubious version of the OS.

But, that said, you should be able to recompile and in theory things might work better... I have heard that there is a new version of the Makefile Engine in 5.1d0, so you might have to play around with the Makefile a bit... Other than that it should compile OOTB.

Thread 6