Two things.
1. I became overwhelmed with desperation due to my current failure to connect with the new Lynch, so after ten years of having Mercedes Lackey recced to me (in retrospect, I think it was my friend Mike's way of coming out to me), I got Magic's Pawn at the library and I have to ask-- am I SUPPOSED to hate Vanyel already? He reads to
(
Read more... )
Comments 24
God I want religious folks to get their bibles out of my vagina.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
According to wikipedia and my own hazy memories, we haven't had a successful amendment since 1992 (it was about congressional pay) and the one before that was the one changing the voting age to 18 in the early 70s.
Reply
The short version of Constitutional amendments is thus: Both houses of Congress, the 100-member Senate and 435-member House of Representatives, must approve a resolution calling for the amendment by a two-thirds vote in both houses. Since this is very difficult to obtain, the amendment rarely passes into the second stage, wherein three-fourths of the fifty states must approve the amendment. I believe the time limit is five or seven or ten years or something, so clearly it's an involved process. Because it's such a big honking deal, this is generally why Constitutional amendments concern things they don't want to be left up to the states individually--hence, slavery, women's suffrage, poll taxes--and/or matters of federal importance, like elections, presidential and congressional terms, income tax, and the like.
Reply
Reply
Reply
AUGH. John McCain, you're a Vietnam vet and you seem like a decent enough guy despite our disagreement on every major issue facing our country, but KEEP YOUR RELIGIOUS-RIGHT INTOLERANCE OUT OF MY VAGINA.
Icon used FOR GREAT JUSTICE.
Reply
I have been avoiding a lot of that, but I would bet that Palin means that her daughter had a choice to either raise the baby herself or give it up for adoption.
Of course it could also be "my daughter had a choice but she made the RIGHT one."
Reply
"Magic's Pawn" - I read it totally differently, but maybe that's because when I first read it I was coming out at the time and could see my own agonies in his character. You also have to keep in mind that her Vanyel series was one of the first ones Lackey wrote upteen years ago - when I reread it now, it is a little heavy handed, but it still rings true for me.
Reply
I'm not to the actual coming out part yet, just a lot of Vanyel sulking up in his room because no one loves him.
when I reread it now, it is a little heavy handed, but it still rings true for me.
I think it's the heavy-handedness that's getting to me-- it almost seems like everyone hates Vanyel SO IRRATIONALLY MUCH which makes it harder for me to get into a mindset where I sympathize/empathize with him. I'm not saying that it's bad, just that that aspect is getting to me.
Reply
Leave a comment