Please read... more on possible terrorist "dry run"

[amberday]

http://www.michellemalkin.com/

(In case you didn't catch my original post on the story earlier today, here it is again: http://www.womenswallstreet.com/WWS/article_landing.aspx?

Comments

[geofire]

I am still skeptical of the account, but I'm not going to outright dismiss it until we learn more. It doesn't sound right, almost like it is "too good to be true" (in the sense of a story about a foiled dry run), you know? It is easy to make up something like that, so I'd like it if one of the reporters would put up an account from another passenger or something like that. I'm not sure how I feel about the "it was confirmed by the air marshalls" thing because organizations like that usually keep their mouths shut until an investigation is concluded.