Dilemmer

[amberdulen]

Which is worse to have for breakfast: nothing, or Easter candy?

Comments

[ladyarkham]

Breakfast is healthy. The healthiness of eating breakfast (especially if you don't regularly!) outweighs the unhealthiness of Easter candy.

Plus, if it's chocolate candy, and you drink milk with it, milk is *extra* health benefit.

[amberdulen]

No milk. :( But it is MILK chocolate. So.

[mbs_bookworm]

You're nowhere near a fridge, grocery store, fast food place, or snack machine?

[amberdulen]

At work; the snack machine only takes coins, and I only have a dollar bill. Woe. I guess I could beg around for change, but that's just sad.

[godgivensmile]

Candy is one of the food groups. I had dinner last night...I ate the rest of my bunny. Mmmmm...bunny... I miss my bunny.

By the way, the Easter bunny will be delayed next year...as I caught him...and ate him, as previously mentioned. ;)

buhahahaha

[catamount3]

Of course, if it was me at that point I'd be ravenously angry, so I vote for the candy. It'd hold of the velociraptor for a little while at least.

[quintessentialp]

I would say a small amount of candy is better than nothing because it gets your metabolism started.