Ask LJ: new home for Project Wednesday data insights

[amoken]

I know, I know, I never write anymore. And when I do it's about projects, not my life. Well, this post is no different (except that I'm actually writing something

Comments

[mtbg]

Other: Buzz shared only with a manually selected group. (Wave is not my most favoritest. Neither is LJ, really.)

[maerdi]

For the last question, I went with the public PW blog because it seems the most upgradeable in case of wider-spread adoption / work on PW, etc. If you don't expect much (if any) expansion, then it seems like the need for a separate blog (with LJ-feed ;) and the need for others to create posts is less important. But it always seems like betting on something not getting more popular/successful is typically a silly bet to make. ;)

[pmb]

Note that any anonymization scheme is doomed to failure. But since it seems like what you are after is an obfuscation scheme rather than an anonymization scheme, it should be fine.

[amoken]

Yeah, pretty much. The current semi-anon labeling is not the best I could do, but none of the folk involved have grumped about it. So, while in theory this is a bothersome issue, it seems not to bother people much in practice.

I suspect people would be more bothered if I posted content analysis that might be linkable to individuals, but I haven't gotten around to implementing content analysis. ;) Well, other than that script that found the top ten not-uninteresting words per account, said by me or them. But it's been broken for years and I haven't posted any results publicly.

[mew0422]

ten not-uninteresting words per account --> check out wordle.net. Huge time suck. Pretty pictures. Goofy font names.