Well, I know I'm a very agnostic theist, but...

[angaelboi]

You scored as agnosticism. You are an agnostic. Though it is generally taken that agnostics neither believe nor disbelieve in God, it is possible to be a theist or an atheist in addition to an agnostic. Agnostics don't believe it is possible to prove the existence of God (nor lack thereof

Comments

RAR I AM A MASSIVE PEDANT ON THIS ISSUE

[maga_dogg]

Agnostics don't believe it is possible to prove the existence of God (nor lack thereof).

RAR! No, that's strong agnosticism. Agnosticism is just the doctrine that you don't believe one way or the other.

It's possible to be a strong agnostic and a theist; it's not possible to be an agnostic proper and a theist.

[obliviousdaze]

I got Satanism over Christianity as well. I'm still trying to figure out how that happened. I knew already that Christianity wouldn't be at the top, but still...

[onyxpheonix]

I came up as something like 95% agnostic. My second and third were Buddism and Hinduism, that were only something in the 70% range.

The whole deal with the Satanism thing isn't what most people think. Satanist don't actually worship or believe in Satan at all. It's more of a rejection of the idea that humans are somehow seperated from the natural laws of the world, i.e. they have devine spirits or have a conscious that places them as higher than animals. They believe there are no consequences for there earthly actions in an "afterlife" and therefore live life without dogmatic restrictions. A lengthy description, but hopefully informative.

[angaelboi]

Well, I think you might be able to more accurately sum it up with: Satanism isn't a worship of the devil so much as a worship of the self.

However, that'd require me to be more self-centered than I am, and I am not.

[ohtori_akio]

Not really; it strikes me that certain forms of existentialism could be seen as Christian agnosticism (sort of like "Jewish atheism," of which there is a long tradition), though in relation to how the philosophy says adherents should act rather than theologically speaking, of course.