Jul 22, 2013 16:20
While I'm very happy for Kate that she's safely delivered, I must admit that I was hoping for a little princess. It would have been fun to have the first female to have a direct place in the British succession that couldn't be superseded by a subsequent male sibling. Alas. Although I suppose, a lad is more accurate.
Leave a comment
Comments 5
(The comment has been removed)
Boy names just aren't as much fun. Although I'm thinking James with Phillip, Louis, Arthur, or George tacked on in there somewhere. With Michael as an outside chance in a nod to Kate's dad as one of the multiple middle names.
Reply
I think Arthur as the first name would be awesome. There has never been a fully for-sure King Arthur. There were two possibilities in the past (one of Henry II's grandsons and Henry VIII's older brother - the one married to Katherine of Aragon), but they both died (or in the case of the former were thrown into prison and promptly murdered by good ol King John) before they could claim the throne.
Reply
I know that both George and Arthur have a strong tradition, I just find them unattractive names personally. I guess we'll find out soon.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment