Comments | angeldesignpro: Science!

angeldesignpro

Science!

Apr 23, 2009 04:52

Poll No cheating via wikipedia/google!

( Read more, if you dare... )

Comments 20

jadedinoblivion April 23 2009, 14:40:40 UTC

I KNEW IT

monkeyking12148 April 23 2009, 15:05:43 UTC

Would it really bother you if you thought you bought a rock of plutonium, then got home and realized, "Oh shit! That asshole gave me pure gold instead! Fucking con-artist."

angeldesignpro April 23 2009, 16:34:24 UTC

Gold is way less good at taking x-rays, going back in time, or initiating a fission reaction designed to trigger fusion amongst heavy isotopes of hydrogen... but it IS awful shiny, so I suppose it would be hard to stay mad for too long.

stuck April 23 2009, 15:43:40 UTC

This is why I only buy platinum.

arisrabkin April 23 2009, 16:51:49 UTC

That Archimedes was a smart cookie.

angeldesignpro April 23 2009, 16:59:33 UTC

Eureka!

angeldesignpro April 23 2009, 17:01:00 UTC

You also have the dubious honor of being the most wrong voter on the poll.

For our readers at home - how does it feel to be as backward about metallic density intuition as you are on politics ;)?

arisrabkin April 23 2009, 17:06:13 UTC

Bah. That's what happens when I click tickyboxes before even getting out of bed.

Thread 15

(The comment has been removed)

angeldesignpro April 24 2009, 05:13:47 UTC

Your text book didn't mention how shiny it is 0.0

ooooohhhh.... shiiiinnyyy...