Do the Right Thing
www.colorquiz.com
Your Existing Situation
Attracted by anything new, modern, or intriguing. Liable to the bored by the humdrum, the ordinary, or the traditional.
Your Stress Sources
Wants to overcome a feeling of emptiness and of separation from others. Believes that life still has far more to offer and that she may miss her share of experiences if she fails to make the best use of every opportunity. She therefore pursues her objectives with a fierce intensity and commits herself deeply and readily. Feels herself to be completely competent in any field in which she engages, and can sometimes be considered by others to be interfering or meddlesome.
Your Restrained Characteristics
Able to achieve satisfaction through sexual activity but is inclined to be emotionally withdrawn, which prevents her from becoming deeply involved.
The situation is preventing her from establishing herself, but she feels she must make the best of things as they are.
Your Desired Objective
Preoccupied with things of an intensely exciting nature, whether erotically stimulating or otherwise. Wants to be regarded as an exciting and interesting personality with an altogether charming and impressive influence on others. Uses tactics skillfully so as to avoid endangering her chances of success or undermining others' confidence in herself.
Your Actual Problem
The fear that she might be prevented from achieving the things she wants leads her to play her part with an urgent and hectic intensity.
Your Actual Problem #2
Fights against restriction or limitation, and insists on developing freely as a result of her own efforts.
I just finished watching "Do the Right Thing," and though I haven't seen Crash yet I'm not sure how the two compare. What I've heard of Crash they make everyone pretty much stereotypical to make a point. In "Do the Right Thing" every character was complex, you understood their motivations, a few of them were racists but those that were explained *why* it wasn't just a blind feeling. The movie really got all up in your face even to the very end where the place ended in flames.
It was brilliant. I loved it and I think that everyone that has seen Crash should take a look at this Spike Lee joint and see what they think.
Now for your opinion on something. Read these two passages and tell me what you think.
1. Who has a better point?
2. Why?
3. Can you relate to either?
4. What would be your solution if you were in the position of Malcolm or Martin?
Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it descending spiral ending in destruction for all. The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. It is immortal because I seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to covert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends by defecting itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
MLKJ
I think there are plenty of good people in America, but there are also plenty of bad people in American and the bad ones are the ones who seem to have all the power and be in these positions to block things that you and I need. Because this is the situation you and I have to preserve the right to do what is necessary to bring and end to that situation, and it doesn’t mean that I advocate violence, but at he same time I am not against using violence in self defense. I don’t even call it violence when it’s in self-defense. I call it intelligence.
What do you think of this?
P.S. I rented Prisoner of Azkaban and The Village from the library. Somebody better come over and watch this shit with me!
Your Existing Situation
Attracted by anything new, modern, or intriguing. Liable to the bored by the humdrum, the ordinary, or the traditional.
Your Stress Sources
Wants to overcome a feeling of emptiness and of separation from others. Believes that life still has far more to offer and that she may miss her share of experiences if she fails to make the best use of every opportunity. She therefore pursues her objectives with a fierce intensity and commits herself deeply and readily. Feels herself to be completely competent in any field in which she engages, and can sometimes be considered by others to be interfering or meddlesome.
Your Restrained Characteristics
Able to achieve satisfaction through sexual activity but is inclined to be emotionally withdrawn, which prevents her from becoming deeply involved.
The situation is preventing her from establishing herself, but she feels she must make the best of things as they are.
Your Desired Objective
Preoccupied with things of an intensely exciting nature, whether erotically stimulating or otherwise. Wants to be regarded as an exciting and interesting personality with an altogether charming and impressive influence on others. Uses tactics skillfully so as to avoid endangering her chances of success or undermining others' confidence in herself.
Your Actual Problem
The fear that she might be prevented from achieving the things she wants leads her to play her part with an urgent and hectic intensity.
Your Actual Problem #2
Fights against restriction or limitation, and insists on developing freely as a result of her own efforts.
I just finished watching "Do the Right Thing," and though I haven't seen Crash yet I'm not sure how the two compare. What I've heard of Crash they make everyone pretty much stereotypical to make a point. In "Do the Right Thing" every character was complex, you understood their motivations, a few of them were racists but those that were explained *why* it wasn't just a blind feeling. The movie really got all up in your face even to the very end where the place ended in flames.
It was brilliant. I loved it and I think that everyone that has seen Crash should take a look at this Spike Lee joint and see what they think.
Now for your opinion on something. Read these two passages and tell me what you think.
1. Who has a better point?
2. Why?
3. Can you relate to either?
4. What would be your solution if you were in the position of Malcolm or Martin?
Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it descending spiral ending in destruction for all. The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. It is immortal because I seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to covert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends by defecting itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
MLKJ
I think there are plenty of good people in America, but there are also plenty of bad people in American and the bad ones are the ones who seem to have all the power and be in these positions to block things that you and I need. Because this is the situation you and I have to preserve the right to do what is necessary to bring and end to that situation, and it doesn’t mean that I advocate violence, but at he same time I am not against using violence in self defense. I don’t even call it violence when it’s in self-defense. I call it intelligence.
What do you think of this?
P.S. I rented Prisoner of Azkaban and The Village from the library. Somebody better come over and watch this shit with me!