I've been giving this a lot of thought. And it comes down to this, for me:
Separation of Church and State.
Really, the government should have absolutely no say in who can and cannot enter into a Spiritual Union before their Gods. Heck, the government trying to tell anyone who can and cannot be married before a Supreme Being is like China trying
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Reply
Someday it may change...I just hope that it is in my lifetime.
Reply
Reply
I agree with you. The problem is....and you know that I think marriage rights ought to be extended to all consenting adult parties...is that the marriage law impacts so many other areas of law that it would cut the feet out from under a bucket of caselaw unrelated to divorce or family...estates, for one. People resist change. Which is not to say that it shouldn't be done...but there's more momentum to the problem than just "bigotry", is all I'm trying to say.
Would you mind re-posting or cross-posting your thoughts at shangy_feminism?
Reply
Enlighten me on how estate law would change if two men or two women could undertake a civil union (what is now termed a legal marriage).
Have never joined this shangy_feminism.
Will check it out.
Reply
Reply
You have the knowin' and the doin' of a lot of things.
Reply
Leave a comment