what did we learn on Amazon today?

Apr 25, 2012 15:26

Anyone who uses the phrase, "Now, I'm no Holmes purist" in a review of anything Sherlock Holmes is about to completely lose their shit over some perceived crime against Conan Doyle, Holmes, the readers, or humanity committed by the work reviewed.

sherlock holmes, books

Leave a comment

Comments 18

crantz April 25 2012, 20:39:59 UTC
I'm still surprised that of all things, it's giving Sherlock a vag that ruins the character forever.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

annlarimer April 25 2012, 20:57:36 UTC
I'm no dick purist, but...

Reply

(The comment has been removed)


wolfy_writing April 25 2012, 21:30:15 UTC
Life gets so much easier when you realize the version you personally don't care for doesn't actually go back and undo your personal favorite interpretation the One And Only True Way To Do It.

Reply


nitasee April 25 2012, 21:31:25 UTC
I'm no Holmes purist, but I'd say some of these people are deeply offended that material in question isn't their personal vision of Holmes. To which I say, pfffft.

Reply


txvoodoo April 25 2012, 22:23:49 UTC
*laughs*

Reply


robanybody April 26 2012, 00:25:47 UTC
Every time someone loses their minds over some perceived ruination of their beloved Holmesian characters, I go put in Without A Clue and watch Michael Caine play Sherlock as a stumbling, alcoholic buffoon while Ben Kingsley's Watson calls him every name in the book. And then I am soothed.

Reply

nitasee April 26 2012, 00:32:04 UTC
I love that movie.

Also love "They Might Be Giants". George C. Scott as a man deluded that he is Sherlock Holmes and Joanne Woodward as his psychiatrist who just happens to be Dr. Watson. It's a charmer.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up