(wtf. shouldn't she be the one who takes care of her child?!?! and also, add the fact that she's asking this much-->meaning she's not working or is sharing with the expenses of the child-->meaning she has the time to take care of the child-->meaning she does not need a fulltime YAYA)
haha, natawa ako dito. onga naman kasi. she's working on the assumption na dennis trillo's paying for everything ata nga.
btw, nice, random post! halatang wala kang magawa sa bahay. ako rin eh.
that's probably one of the major reasons dennis broke it up with her.
i would not want a wife who does not know how to handle our finances, since most probably i would want to be the provider and my wife, the one who manages the house.
nako. wala pa yan sa hiningi ni pops kay martin noon. kung di ako nagkakamali 100,000 yun per month, ewan ko kung per child for both children na. either way, malaki talaga yung amount eh ang tagal tagal na nun.
ipo-proportion pa kasi yan ng judge sa kinikita ni dennis at nung nanay din tsaka dun sa needs ng bata. muka namang maraming projects si dennis at barya lang sa kanya yung 60 thousand a month (ilang taping nya lang to kikitain). alangan namang kahit lumaki nang lumaki yung kinikita nya eh hindi makatikim yung bata ng proportionate amount dun at ang ibigay sa kanya eh yung "tama lang."
agree ako dyan sa sinasabi mo about child care, and the amount of financing you dedicate for the child could never make up dun sa pagkukulang mo being the parent to the child
( ... )
the things she posted there are a bit too high lng tlga, even for a rich person.
as for misc, like travel (abroad), material things, (important misc) education, etc-->its a different thing and she should have noted it in the expenses. and i guess its really complicated.
basta, kelangan nila ng comprehensive expenses list, not only now, but in the future also (doing future value and present value, etc.). (finance 101 for the child. ^_^)
child care? ano gagawin ni dennis, sya maga-alaga ng bata? out of the question na yung marriage. hindi naman yung issue rito. ang issue rito eh kung ano ang responsibilidad ni dennis, at yun eh suportahan yung anak nya financially. hindi nya responsibilidad na alagaan yun kasi sa mga ganitong case, sa nanay napupunta ang illegitimate child at sya ang nage-exercise ng parental control dun. may tender years presumption pa kasi sa pilipinas kaya expected na ang nanay ang dapat mag-alaga. tsaka, may i point out lang, hindi ka makakapag-child care ng wala kang pera
( ... )
Comments 23
Reply
haha, natawa ako dito. onga naman kasi. she's working on the assumption na dennis trillo's paying for everything ata nga.
btw, nice, random post! halatang wala kang magawa sa bahay. ako rin eh.
Reply
add ko lng:
that's probably one of the major reasons dennis broke it up with her.
i would not want a wife who does not know how to handle our finances, since most probably i would want to be the provider and my wife, the one who manages the house.
Reply
Reply
and she does not know its value, how hard it is to earn that amount of money. kaya siguro ganyan nlng sya makahingi
Reply
ipo-proportion pa kasi yan ng judge sa kinikita ni dennis at nung nanay din tsaka dun sa needs ng bata. muka namang maraming projects si dennis at barya lang sa kanya yung 60 thousand a month (ilang taping nya lang to kikitain). alangan namang kahit lumaki nang lumaki yung kinikita nya eh hindi makatikim yung bata ng proportionate amount dun at ang ibigay sa kanya eh yung "tama lang."
Reply
:-)
Reply
Reply
Reply
the things she posted there are a bit too high lng tlga, even for a rich person.
as for misc, like travel (abroad), material things, (important misc) education, etc-->its a different thing and she should have noted it in the expenses. and i guess its really complicated.
basta, kelangan nila ng comprehensive expenses list, not only now, but in the future also (doing future value and present value, etc.). (finance 101 for the child. ^_^)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment