Warning: this post is about to get rant-tacular.
People and things are pissing me off lately. This is not unusual, as I am rather stressed and often prone to misanthropy, but I'm fairly seething at people trying to shove this ideas down my throat.
First of all, shut up about Nirvana! I must be part of some misguided minority that feels absolutely
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Reply
When it comes down to it, the Bond I think of visually is actually Pierce Brosnan, though I favour the acting approach taken by Timothy Dalton. I still have favourite movies for each actor, in spite of this. The point of there being so many Bonds is that the producers can continue to make money off the franchise when one (inevitably) gets disillusioned and another is called on step in. This means there's got to be a Bond and an interpretation (usually dependent on the zeitgeist) to suit everybody.
I find it sad sometimes how much thought I give to this particular fictional character.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Oh, the 90s. How dirty. BUT, the X-Files came out of the 90s and it's about the only thing I like from that craptastic decade (I hate the 80s too though. I seem to hate the decades I lived in. Perhaps they all just fucking sucked and I wasn't alive to experience the ones before the 80s). *goes back to x-philing and obsessing about the MSR*
Sean Connery, I have no opinion of him. Nor has he even entered my mind probably in the last year or more. But I did like that camelot movie he was in.
And the point of your post -- having your own opinions and having a right to have them. Yes, much agreed. To independent thought!
Reply
Reply
I don't think there is a decade for me yet. But I do love some of the clothes back in the Edwardian era, and the era that would be Narnia-esque (those dresses they wear, oh, I love them!) But those decades come with lots of other crap I don't like and no computers or internet.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment