Leave a comment

Comments 4

richdrich March 9 2009, 07:10:35 UTC
Not actually true. Some plastics biodegrade or photodegrade.

Reply

xhile March 9 2009, 07:59:50 UTC
Hi Rich *waves* :)

I think I read that photodegrading is faster than biodegrading, which is an argument for not having plastics buried away from the light in landfills.

I'm not sure when plastic biodegrades to a point where the actual plastic molecules themselves are broken down.

For that matter, although i can take a guess at "molecules being completely broken down into their constituent atoms", i don't know what the definition of "complete" biodegradation is.

I'd like some open-minded chemists to contribute; maybe I need to hunt some down. I'm a little out of my depth in some of this.

Reply

xhile March 9 2009, 08:22:24 UTC
nb, not at ALL wanting to shut down debate. I don't claim to know everything about this by any means. :-)

Reply


xhile March 9 2009, 08:03:29 UTC
Recording this while I have it handy:

"There are other plastic materials that claim biodegradability, but are more often (and possibly more accurately) described as 'degradable' or oxi-degradable; It is claimed that this process causes more rapid breakdown of the plastic materials into CO2 and H2O."

from the *cough* Wikipedia article on biodegradation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodegrade#Indicative_lengths_of_degradation

which also lists times for some plastics to degrade, but i suspect some of these times are far too short. I may be wrong. Also depends on where these items degrade: Surface (sunlight) may degrade faster than burial.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up