um, doesn't that make George W. Bush a far much more deadly killer than Osama Bin Laden? I'm just waiting for him to be responsible for more American deaths than Osama Bin Laden.
Reading a bunch of things about the report, I think the 100k figure may very well be an exageration. However, it isn't by an order of magnitute or anything even reomtly close to that. The death toll in Iraq makes 9/11 pale in comparison.
But, you know, those are no americans, so they don't count.
Comments 2
I'm just waiting for him to be responsible for more American deaths than Osama Bin Laden.
Reply
But, you know, those are no americans, so they don't count.
Reply
Leave a comment