As I've stated elsewhere, once I finished season two of New Who, I was going to rewatch and review what I call my "Her Name was Rose" collection (click
here for the full list of episodes).
(
On with 'Dalek' now ... Spoilers for 'The Long Game' and vague references here and there to Daleks. That's about it this time around. )
I do have answers to some (though not all...!) of your criticisms, but I think there's nothing uglier than a writer coming over all self-justifying. So instead I'll just be glad you liked the story overall. (I will just say though, because it's on record anyway, that I had nothing to do with the towns beginning with 'S' scene, and that was a late insert by Russell when the BBC got concerned I let Van Statten off the hook too easily. I'm not fond of the scene, but I can understand why they wanted it.)
Reply
(I will just say though, because it's on record anyway, that I had nothing to do with the towns beginning with 'S' scene, and that was a late insert by Russell when the BBC got concerned I let Van Statten off the hook too easily. I'm not fond of the scene, but I can understand why they wanted it.Ah, well, that explains a lot; I didn't know that. (I'm fairly new to the fandom.) I can see the flow out of the second-to-last last Doctor/Rose scene and then the final scene (him still talking briefly about the Dalek and Rose telling him he has her still) much better ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I would be curious about the why of the deletion of the hug, I know there's been a lot of speculation about that (including in this thread) and also why the Doctor revealed so much of himself to Van Statten in the elevator. I just don't understand why he would reveal so much of himself after seeing/knowing what Van Statten was. I get it in the cage with the Dalek, emotions brought up and stuff, but not afterwards with Van Statten.
Thanks again for commenting, I love hearing from the writer's point of view.
(BTW, I read your user profile and friended you after reading a couple of posts. You said to go for it, so I did, LOL!)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Oh, this is just brilliant. As I was reading this, I was just nodding my head in agreement. I want to kick myself for not consciously catching that enough to acknowledge because it's so perfect, so true. But, I suppose I'll offer that as a compliment to you that I was so engrossed in the scene and the story that it fit so organically, it didn't even stand out. But, yeah, brilliant.
... it was originally a longer discussion, which got cut down to a single line. I once thought that worked - now I'm not so sure.
I love the line (as do many in the fandom), but it's intriguing to know that there was a longer discussion there. Hmm ...
The stuff in the lift? The Doctor has met a Dalek. Everything has changed. The world could end. Even worse ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Oh, I don't think you have to worry about that. I loved Goddard, and the female soldier who had the one big scene was quite, quite memorable. Not bland at all. (And, of course, the snarky military guy who told the Doctor he could take out the tin robot.) Adam and Van Statten weren't bland, stock characters either. For me, personally, I just wasn't overly impressed with the acting.
Many happy returns, and have a great birthday! And do feel free to keep in touch.
Thank you! :)
Reply
*big hugs and fruity alcoholic things*
If I could, I'd totally move Swancon to London - now about those instantaneous transportors we were discussing :)
I found your insight beautiful and interesting, especially now that it's a few years later. Seeing everyone else's comments as well makes for a great deal of food for thought.
*much love*
Reply
It was a pleasure reading about your point of view on this. I found this very beneficial and I really feel like I understand the episode better now.
Also, I'm fangirling like crazy right now, because AN ACTUAL DOCTOR WHO WRITER IS ON LIVEJOURNAL AND COMMENTED A POST ABOUT DOCTOR WHO.
I'm sorry, I just had to get that out of my system.
So, again, thanks for taking the time to explain all of this. It was very helpful and SO COOL.
Thanks a lot,
Rachel
Reply
Thanks, Rob, for generously giving your time to elaborate for us, and thanks, arabian, for posting this review in the first place :)
Reply
I truly can not express how thrilled I am to actually get the writer's thoughts on the whys and whyfores of what came into the end result of this episode. I spend so much time thinking on what it all means, analyzing it to death, to actually be able to get a back and forth with the writer himself? No words.
I've never been happier at my decision to do these rewatch-reviews since it led to this.
Reply
I think, hand on heart, that my script benefits hugely from an impassioned performance from Chris - rather than Chris benefitting from my script! But that's kind of you to say.
I remember the first time I saw the Dalek confrontation scene, with Chris determinedly investing in the part (as he told us) the horror of a holocaust survivor meeting one of his captors. And I was stunned by how much anger and despair and honesty he was able to get out of the lines. The lines are really much simpler and balder than you'd think - it's Chris who gives them depth.
Reply
This was fascinating reading the ins and outs of how it all came about. I think this is very interesting:
I knew that Russell planned on writing a story called at that point 'The Companion Who Couldn't' for the episode seven slot. It'd be a yarn which emphasised that not just *anybody* is up to the job of travelling in the TARDIS - and by showing how Adam was too frightened to cope with the experience, how remarkable Rose was in comparison. It's not a bad idea, but I think the trouble was that it's one of those concepts that quickly get out of date once the production's being made. By the time 'Dalek' was being made, it was pretty clear to all that Rose was special already, and that Billie had a terrific chemistry with Chris, without bringing someone in who hadn't and didn't to labour the point.And that makes so much sense. It really does make it so clear; you never really know just how things will hit when all is ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment