Application of Ethical Analysis to Negotiation (STAR and Bullard House Case)

Apr 20, 2006 22:55

This week’s two negotiations left me conflicted, torn, and extremely confused. Up until now, I have not encountered negotiations where ethical questions were brought to the forefront of the negotiation or atleast encountered it consciously. Rather, we have instead focused on being collaborative, most often by sharing every fact or piece of ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 1

sameerpunyani April 25 2006, 06:08:00 UTC
Arash-

I'm glad you're feeling chipper, and I too like "tearin up my heart" by nsync. Anyways, your three main points are well taken, though you could have expanded specifically on them more in the body of your journal. I think the point you brought up that Grant would not know how to react in your situation with the STAR case is important. Yet it can also be seen as a cop-out to the real question of whether or not you believed you were unethical in your actions, ultimately your decision in Bullard made you feel better though had you done the Bullard case first do you think you would have dealt with STAR differently?

3/3

-TA Sameer

Reply


Leave a comment

Up