Левый Мозг

[arbat]

Не путать с левым получшарием обычного мозга. Левый мозг, - это тот мозг, в котором свобода - это рабства, война это мир, и так далее. Это тот мозг, где человек, который отчаянно бьется против свободы называется "либерал", и идеи строительства социализма называются, вот уже второе столетие подряд, - "прогрессивными".

Еще два примера,

Comments

[poltorazhyda]

So, were you always prepared to justify the incineration of women and children, or was there a turning point in your life?

[arbat]

I take it, you want to disagree with something I said, but could not find an non-hysterical argument.

[poltorazhyda]

I take it, the suggestion that justifying the mass incineration of women and children is repugnant is hysterical to you.

[arbat]

You did not suggest that. You suggested that I am "prepared to justify incineration..." That was a hysterical argument and a lie.

The last comment is just a lie.

Wanna try some more?

[poltorazhyda]

When you say things like "Hiroshima was bombed in a military cause in a just war against an agressor," are you not justifying the bombing of Hiroshima?

[arbat]

Yes, I am justifying the bombing of Hiroshima. It allowed to end war faster and saved millions of lives, - men, women, children, everyone.

[poltorazhyda]

So, you are justifying the incineration of the civilians who were incinerated there. Are you going to apologize for calling me a liar for pointing this out?

My original question still stands-did you always believe that burning people alive (which was a major component of Hiroshima) is sometimes OK, or was there a point where you switched over.

[arbat]

Why would I apologize?

You ARE a liar.

You take my statement, throw away some important parts and pretend that the rest is the same as the original. It is a lie - and a quite stupid one at that, - given how easy it is to compare to the original.

Now, another show of stupidity is that you expect me to go for it and to conduct a conversation with someone that honest.

[poltorazhyda]

I'm going to forego the opportunity to exchange insults with you-what could I call you that you aren't clearly showing yourself to be?

What important parts of your statement does my summary omit? You think that bombing Hiroshima (and, presumably, the firebombing of Dresden, Tokyo, etc.) were justified as long as they were expedient to our victory. What nuance am I missing that makes this anything but the justification of burning civilians alive?

[arbat]

I did not say "expedient to our victory", I said that it allowed us to end war quickly and to save millions of people.

You intentionally omitted this. First, trying to create an impression that I justify "incineration of people" for no reason. Now you are trying to pretend that my reasons are no more than some warmongering slogans.

Now, as far as I can tell, you are not that dumb to not understand the difference between "we do what we can to minimize the number of casualties" and "let's kill those people for our victory!" Nobody is THAT dumb, not really.

When someone says things like this, and I call him an idiot, - it is only because I am being generous and like to allow a person an excuse. Honestly, though, I think that people who do that - you included, - are most indecent, vicious pieces of shit.

This said, you are no longer welcome here.

[dandorfman]

Какая у Вас выдержка!
Вы его так долго терпели. Завидую.

[arbat]

Мое терпение не есть общественный ресурс. Оно отмеряется сугубо индивидуально и весьма субъективно. Я считал, что он заслуживает большего терпения, чем многие другие, он его получил сполна и он его сполна же израсходовал.

[dreamswimer]

Well, try to imagine that USSR somehow obtained couple of A-bombs in January 1945 - just before/during final offences to liberate Poland and Germany. Would USSR hesitate to use this bombs against Berlin or other big soft industrial target, which is most suitable for such weapon?

[darth_sipid]

And you, when did you suddenly realize that slavery is OK? (Or, is it "was OK"?)