(Untitled)

Mar 27, 2008 21:41


Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 10

crash_g0ddess March 28 2008, 03:01:18 UTC
I think you sent me a text about that a while ago, and I didn't even see it until today! I hate cell phones. >:(

I'm a big fan of digital just because it's so convenient. You can also get a pretty nice camera for not a lot of money. I don't use film at all because I don't want to pay for developing costs (which is how I justify getting a more expensive camera).

It ultimately depends on what you're going to use it for, and how fast you want to see those pictures...

Reply

crash_g0ddess March 28 2008, 03:46:19 UTC
I guess as a further note, I use an advanced point-and-shoot, not a DSLR, and it works really well for what I need.

Reply


tgunter March 28 2008, 03:11:04 UTC
Go for whatever sort of digital camera you think you can afford.

If you use your camera with any frequency, a digital camera will pay itself off rather quickly. The cost of film and development adds up, and you can fit enough photographs on a memory card to equal a camera's cost in film and development these days. Plus being able to access the images immediately and know whether the shot turned out while you're still able to reshoot is invaluable.

Cell phone cameras are pretty worthless except for last resorts.

Obviously you're not looking to spend a lot of money, but I would recommend going for a name brand at least, Canon, Nikon, and Sony being the big three in digital. Stay away from HPs or Kodaks, I've never been impressed with them.

Reply


tandooribone March 28 2008, 03:39:26 UTC
If you're looking for a full featured digital camera, you really can't go wrong with the Nikon D40 - you can find it for a little over $500 (with lens), and it supports a wide variety of additional/third party lenses and filters. Really great for a starter DSLR.

If you buy a cheaper point-and-shoot, you may end up feeling stuck with it if you find yourself becoming more and more enamored with photography.

Reply

area_woman March 28 2008, 03:52:25 UTC
Hah. I don't think I could spend more than about $150, at the moment. If a point-and-shoot works for crash_g0ddess, it's more than enough for me.

Keep in mind I've been using a cell phone camera for the past year.

Reply

tandooribone March 28 2008, 03:55:05 UTC
In that case, I'd say stick with the film camera, especially if you can process your own film.

Reply

area_woman March 28 2008, 04:01:57 UTC
...by "process your own film" you mean take it to Walgreens, right? ;)

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

area_woman March 29 2008, 01:42:42 UTC
It's a neat little camera that (with the help of a firmware hack) can do things like exposure bracketing for HDR, focus bracketing, motion sensing, and shooting to RAW.

...this journal entry is doing a lot to teach me that I know jackshit about cameras. D:

Reply


Leave a comment

Up