"Fresh" Technology.

Apr 25, 2003 18:06

Finally something to assist our intemperate friends in the bureau of love ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 23

apollo_dot_com April 25 2003, 10:15:00 UTC
I can't say as I've had any complaints, and I'm sure you haven't either (setting aside the fact that neither of us has had any complaints about the other). As for Bacchus_dot_com, as far as I've been able to figure out, the earlier he ejaculates (to avoid the obvious crudities), the more times he's able to repeat his performance with the same partner in the same session.

It's a gift I guess. And an impressive one.

Why can't you do that?

Reply

Such insolence. ares_dot_com April 25 2003, 10:20:19 UTC
Well as potentially flattering as orgasming on mere sight may be.. After 30 "deliveries", the walk toward him becomes somewhat treacherous. And I've no interest in playing school janitor foreplay.

Reply

Re: Such insolence. apollo_dot_com April 25 2003, 10:22:40 UTC
Hrm. He does like some strange games, doesn't he? And yet, he spends more time in your bed than any six of the rest of us combined (with, of course, the exception of dite_dot_com. Hrm.....

Reply

He does? ares_dot_com April 25 2003, 10:28:35 UTC
I think I've fallen from favour. *places his hand on his chest*

You, however, seem to be no fly in his wine.

Reply


nazier April 25 2003, 10:24:58 UTC
The problem is that normal condoms deaden the sensation for women as well. They take away some of the sensation and cause irritation in the mucus membranes. So now we have a nobody wins thing going on. Of course I have heard more men complain that they last to long and tire out their partners before they can orgasm.

I think the problem on either side is to much psychological pressure on people these days to get the big O that they forget that the goal should just be pleasure. Pleasure does not require an orgasm, that is just a bonus.

Anyhow that is my .02

Reply

*grins* ares_dot_com April 25 2003, 10:32:53 UTC
That was a far too savant-like observation for this silly topic.

Reply

Re: *grins* nazier April 25 2003, 10:38:51 UTC
What do you want, I am at work. And funny enough this topis was brought up last night in another conversation, but that was about Hello Kitty vibrators and cock rings.

In other words now that I am single again, and it being spring SEX is on the mind.

Reply

Re: *grins* meganirene April 25 2003, 10:50:20 UTC
You said it!!
There are two sex toys I want: the Hello Kitty Vibrator you just mentioned and this: www.audi-oh.com

Reply


illian April 25 2003, 11:44:24 UTC
Have none of them heard of cockrings? Sweet Gods Above and Below, when do I get to cash in this life for a better incarnation?

Reply

ares_dot_com April 25 2003, 12:53:19 UTC
Cockrings are sporting, there's no doubt, but they don't however provide any protection against the inevitable. They just prolong.

One could make the argument, though, that anyone that interested in extending the length of the encounter has presumably been roughing up the other person for some time.

But this is honestly not my area of proficiency. I prefer prolonging someone's death, or conflict, or neck in a noose.

Reply

illian April 25 2003, 13:22:31 UTC
Well, prolongation seems to be the point of those condoms. If I needed one I'd far prefer a cockring and a regular condom to using something that numbs.

Don't make me scoff. Like you aren't as interested in the "little deaths" as the major ones. After all, how many duels, battles, and wars have been fought due to the ache for another? Or even the desire to prove someone's own manhood?

Reply


milissa April 25 2003, 14:13:55 UTC
drunk penises...how bout condoms that cause amnesia? I'd go back to that method if they could guarantee that the person wearing them would forget about meeting his buddies at the bar for a few beers.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Re: *grins* meganirene April 28 2003, 07:14:13 UTC
That's...different...
But I could work with that!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up