Courtesy of brewergnome

Feb 20, 2008 10:53

Now we can stop wondering why. (I still think hormones are a good explanation, but this isn't too shabby...)

Leave a comment

Comments 9

bexone February 20 2008, 16:35:15 UTC
Does this mean I have to stop using you two as my "it's a million times more complicated than either nature or nurture, you homophobic asswipes" example now?

Reply

ariestar February 20 2008, 16:38:17 UTC
Probably not, because it's still pretty complicated, it seems.

Reply

bexone February 20 2008, 16:52:50 UTC
oh good. you guys have been my secret weapon for *mumblety* years now, I'd hate to have to give you up. :->

Reply


giliofleaves February 20 2008, 19:44:27 UTC
ariestar February 20 2008, 20:54:25 UTC
Perhaps it's a good survival gene--the more gay uncles you have, the more fabulous you are.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

giliofleaves February 21 2008, 02:19:45 UTC

a bit o' bio cosmic_hiccup February 20 2008, 21:11:08 UTC
There is also the epigenome. The epigenome controls which genes are switched on/off and when, which is environmentaly cued, partly in your life, partly in your fetal development, partly in your father's life, and partly in your mother's fetal development.

So even if you have exactly the same DNA as each other, you have different genes switched on and off, producing different humans.

Reply

Re: a bit o' bio ariestar February 20 2008, 21:37:01 UTC
...but only the ones that switched during our own fetal development and lives, since our mother's fetal development (I'm assuming this is the end of her influence, since women are born with all their eggs, I seem to remember hearing from Miss Odell) and our father's life up to the point of conception are the same. I'm also assuming that since we are less identical than certain other twin pairs, we were an "early split" with two sacs, so basically we only had one millisecond of fetal development we shared...

TELL ME MORE

Reply

Re: a bit o' bio ariestar February 20 2008, 21:42:49 UTC
Also, one of the reasons I've been using the "hormone in the sac" theory to explain things is that the Human Genome Project reported no "gay gene"--not that it's perfect, but I kind of like the idea of gender where you can be masculine or feminine regardless of the other, so it's possible to be mostly masculine and kinda feminine, making you gay because of hormones and stuff, but not yet transgender or genderqueer.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up