Pop Quiz

[arizzo22]

aight ive been asking people for their views on this statement/question so please drop your ideas thank you. How can somebody feel love without the sense of touch? i will share my views once you share yours, see i can do that since im the teacher i guess, anyways thanks again.

Comments

[drowninduckie]

You don't need to feel touch to feel love. Love is without a doubt one of the hardest emtions to explain I think though. From my experiance, when you love a person, you know it right away. It just happens. You don't need to touch them, you don't even really need to see them, love just falls upon you in the wierdest ways sometimes.

[burymyheart]

The sense of touch is related to that of the '5 senses'. Individually, you can't feel the emotion that we know as love, simply because of it's complexity and individual preference. Yet, at the same time, love can be felt with touch, smell, sight, sound, and taste. So, I wouldn't exclusively say that love is only related to touch, because you can very well sense love with the sight of a flower, or with the taste of your g-friends apple pie or whatever. In short, love is simple too complex to just label it as being able to sense it through touch. Man, I hope that wasn't too confusing.

[burymyheart]

simply* (I'd let it slide, but typo's bother me too much)

[arizzo22]

aight since you gave your opinons which i thank you very much for here's my opinion or questions. that the statement has two meanings one being that would love really be love if you had no way of expressing directly to the one you love since they are not there, there for being the touch. the second being can you feel love for someone else or from someone else if you cant really sense love within yourself.