(Untitled)

[arsenicgraffiti]

1. One thing that has always troubled me is the exclusively post-Medieval mentality buried within the heart of the philosophy of religion. Granted, the tying up of morality and religion in Catholicism and the validity of the existence of G/god are the main concerns of the philosophers we cover in that area, but does it have to continue as such in

Comments

Coming From a Philosophy Major

[anonymous]

The thing with Ateneo is that it is an institution. An institution is an established organization whose aim is to reproduce its ideas. There will always be a theistic bent seen in the way a teacher covertly/overtly takes recourse to the wisdom and/or established arguments found in the Catholic Tradition, one-sided readings, and a hell-bent critique of schools-of-thought that may go against institutional values of man-for-others, cura personalis, amdg, magis, bumaba ka sa bundok, and what not. Postmodernists are criticized for lacking the objectivity (of morals and meaning) found in Christianity, atheistic existentialism for its stress on individuality and his/her responsibility to create meaning for him/herself through the choices s/he makes and the actions s/he undertakes, and the legacy of the "Age of Enlightenment" for its stress on reason (e.g. Kant's "Sapere Aude"), empiricism, and the rigorous deductive reasoning used as an intellectual scalpel against the established order, dogma, sentiments, tradition, and whatnot