Leave a comment

Comments 11

gizzybiscuits August 31 2010, 17:40:30 UTC
Graaats :3.

Reply

gizzybiscuits August 31 2010, 17:45:24 UTC
Also kinda get you on the 'society says females = secks' thing, they just...I dunno, to me its like they have more to be interested in in a way (Bewbs) since I guess they were portrayed that way for so long which can confuse me and aasdfghjjk. Any ideas on how you tell the difference between 'oh chicks are just supposed to be hawter period' and actual attraction >.>?

Srry if I'm derailing off your own personal experiences here.

Reply

autobottrixter September 1 2010, 03:20:18 UTC
I started out not by considering whether I found women attractive, but whether I genuinely found men physically attractive. And I realized that, while I valued their companionship, I didn't really. So then it was just a matter of figuring out whether I was asexual, bisexual, or homosexual. That was when I started peeling back all those justifications I had made for myself and realized I really was genuinely attracted to women in a way I wasn't to men. I can identify what I have been taught are attractive traits in men, but with women I have my own opinions on what is and is not attractive that have a deeper basis. Men just don't move me the same way.

Reply

gizzybiscuits September 2 2010, 13:04:47 UTC
Ooh thanks for the info :3. I'll mull over it.

Its just confusing 'cause sometimes I wonder if (With me) its just a form of autosexualness/self-insertion in wanting to be hawt/seeing the straight sex as hawt/really cannot see myself as romantically attached to a chick, which makes me wonder if that's like being the reverse of a non-aromantic asexual and if that makes it 'not count'. I liek slapping a ? on things.

Anyways grats and thanks again, hope you find happy things with your self-discovery.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up