Comments | b_daniels: Who said cheaters don't prosper?

b_daniels

Who said cheaters don't prosper?

Feb 08, 2008 14:12

Did you know a 1d10 can generate a negative #? I didn't ( Read more... )

Comments 50

(The comment has been removed)

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:29:45 UTC

Yep I learned how to draw a negative -4 for my pulls, or so it says. It was AWESOME.

(The comment has been removed)

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:34:11 UTC

Both it looks like.

Thread 6

pen_dragon February 8 2008, 19:29:30 UTC

Did you know a 1d10 can generate a negative #? I didn't.

So... what did I just miss in that proxy write-up? Feel free to email me offlist if you like?

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:33:12 UTC

I drew at least one negative #, somehow my pulls are all below my actual base pull. Even though I was never targeted by an effect beyond Cheval. Maybe it's a custom Cheval that penalizes rolls somehow.

(The comment has been removed)

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:51:56 UTC

I know what my base #s are, and there is no mathematical explanation that explains how those things happen.

Thread 15

cronono February 8 2008, 19:31:12 UTC

I probably won't keep in touch. I'm only friends with you for your MC.

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:36:14 UTC

I get that alot. It's pretty impressive. Not impressive enough apparently, but impressive.

cronono February 8 2008, 19:37:01 UTC

I've also seen the wood its in. VERY Impressive.

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:38:14 UTC

It was more impressive before you manhandled it all up the stairway.

Jerk.

Thread 5

charlesland February 8 2008, 19:34:35 UTC

I am so glad that I ignored the proxy

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:37:05 UTC

Good move. Though from the look of it I think the people who sent stuff in avoided it too.

charlesland February 8 2008, 19:43:10 UTC

Sorry dude, I have no idea what was going on between December and now, but it seems to have become a real cluster.

b_daniels February 8 2008, 19:54:09 UTC

It's cool man, it's been a log rolling since ICC.

(The comment has been removed)

b_daniels February 8 2008, 20:20:04 UTC

That sounds good man. I expect I'll show at some point, if only because nycciangel has ST interests at some cons and I doubt I'll make her go by herself.

(The comment has been removed)

b_daniels February 8 2008, 20:29:26 UTC

Tempting, but futile in the end.

I'd actually used the Wedding Crashers line at ICC, and I got dogpiled by ANSTs for my trouble.

There is a certain don't rock the boat be friends with everyone let's all hug mentality that's expected now and if that doesn't work for you, you're simply not welcome. Thems the breaks.