It's interesting to read
Paul Cornell's commentary about Convergence - in a very real way, he makes it clear that it is the convention that I wanted Minicon to be, a decade or so ago. He also makes it clear that the things we were squabbling about during the Late Unpleasantness were a matter of perception, not of fact - it was and is perfectly
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(I do understand the whole Gother than you thing though.)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
One could even get the feeling that this CONvergence elephant is actually made up of large & sturdy half-full glasses of Blog. All The Way Down.
8)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
In the proposal that Martin, Erik and myself made for Minicon 34, we weren't opposed to making the convention smaller. However, the route we suggested was for Minicon/MinnStf to spin-off some of the viable sub-fandom elements of the convention into their own conventions, over time. This would've created a constellation of "daughter" conventions, potentially, each with their own set of fans - and hopefully grateful to MinnStf for sponsoring them in the first place. The board decided to go with the Gang of Ten instead.
*shrug*
Reply
Leave a comment