I dunno. Its a hard choice. I'm not supprised at all about how long its taking.
I agree with you. I mean.. "Court-appointed doctors say she is in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery." If she has no hope of recovery why keep her alive suffering?
Its been 15 years in bed, and 7 years of legal battle to remove the tube. Its been removed three times and reinserted twice. Her parents just wont let go.
It boils down to pure selfishness. They don't want to feel the pain of losing her, or guilt that they could have done more while she was still really honestly alive, so they make her suffer silently so they don't have to.
Indeed, some always hold on to hope in the face the hopeless.
One note though, starvation is pretty fucked up. But if they actually euthanized her, youd get even more people bitching. Too bad we cant just straight up kill them.
Well it is selfishness but also it would be wrong to starve her to death... so if there was another way... and straight up killing would be horrid... Jake where’s your head?
Straight up kill the people opposing euthanasia =P Which is "The act or practice of ending the life of an suffering individual" Some people take "Pro Life" way to far. "Lets let them wither away instead of let them die with some dignity!" Yeah!
Comments 9
Reply
I'm not supprised at all about how long its taking.
I agree with you. I mean..
"Court-appointed doctors say she is in a persistent vegetative state with no hope of recovery."
If she has no hope of recovery why keep her alive suffering?
Reply
Reply
That's all anti-euthanasia is. Selfishness.
Bah, when I am king...
Reply
One note though, starvation is pretty fucked up. But if they actually euthanized her, youd get even more people bitching. Too bad we cant just straight up kill them.
Reply
and straight up killing would be horrid... Jake where’s your head?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment