Apr 18, 2006 14:34
Euxippus? And why are fan ficcers writing about him in their Alexander stories. I don't think I've ever seen this name in any history of Alexander. And I cannot find it anywhere in Mary Renault's trilogy either. So...
WTH?
B.
Leave a comment
Comments 6
It was said Alexander took a fancy on this young page of his, and his beauty was compared to Hephaistion's - the youngest one found lacking in virility in compareson.
Reply
B
Reply
In other words, Euxenippos was pretty and soft and as dumb as a bag of hammers. Nice to look at, but never going to hold Alexander's attention for long. ;)
Or I could be totally wrong and Euxippus is a construct of purely original fanon. *shrug*
Reply
Reply
B.
Reply
True. Of course, the same could be said for a certain eunuch we all know - but fan ficcers are generally not to be put off by such things as limited sources and dodgy Latin translations! Though the fact that Curtius bothers to even note what the boy looked like and then compare him to the king's dear friend does look a little like he's fishing for inferences, perhaps. Ah, those Romans. They do love a good scandal. ;)
To be fair though, if the fan ficcers did pick this stuff up from pothos.org, then at least they're doing some research. That's got to be a start, surely? ;)
Reply
Leave a comment