MR MILLER: So let me say a few things about it. Number one, I think it’s important to put in context why - what happened that led up to this event. First of all, the Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area around the negotiated Israeli-Syrian buffer zone, which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations that would threaten the state of Israel and would threaten civilians inside Israel. Every country has the right to take action against terrorist organizations, and every country, I think, would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist organizations on its border, especially in volatile times, as we obviously are in right now in Syria.
The second thing that is important is that Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions. And so ultimately, what we want to see is lasting stability between Israel and security - sorry, Israel and Syria, and that means we support all sides upholding the
( ... )
...what we want to see is lasting stability between Israel and security - sorry, Israel and Syria
Оговорка, конечно, тоже шикарная - стабильности нигде не хватает. Но Израиль хотя бы на этот раз предупредил о планах, пришлось консультировать. Так что мероприятие совместное, пусть г-н Миллер пока и не готов to speak to the contents of those private diplomatic conversations.
Это вообще наважно. Укоризненные взоры были бы уместны если бы американцы утверждали что придерживаются закона. Но они на это и не претендуют, постулируя rule based world.
А при чём тут "укоризненные взоры"? Я про стиль. "Оправданный захват" - это настолько не в стиле Госдепа, что нельзя не заподозрить напев Рабиновича. В Госдепе так не говорят.
Для понимания контекста неплохо было бы процитировать вопрос, на который отвечал г-н Миллер.
QUESTION: Can I just ask about another neighbor, Israel? Israel has said that, for instance, this is the first time since the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War it has openly gone across the Golan Heights and said it’s creating what it calls a temporary buffer zone. How do you feel about this? I mean, the UN has said that it’s a violation. Does the United States agree? First of all, does the U.S. agree that it’s a violation?
В общем, не отрицал, что нарушение имеет место быть. Но оправдывает "расширение буферной зоны" всякими potentially ... that could ... that would и обещаниями Израиля что это временно.
Вот прямо "захватом" назвал? Оправданым? Это точно Госдеп так назвал? А не Рабинович ли это Карузо перепел?
Reply
дословно так
MR MILLER: So let me say a few things about it. Number one, I think it’s important to put in context why - what happened that led up to this event. First of all, the Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area around the negotiated Israeli-Syrian buffer zone, which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations that would threaten the state of Israel and would threaten civilians inside Israel. Every country has the right to take action against terrorist organizations, and every country, I think, would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist organizations on its border, especially in volatile times, as we obviously are in right now in Syria.
The second thing that is important is that Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions. And so ultimately, what we want to see is lasting stability between Israel and security - sorry, Israel and Syria, and that means we support all sides upholding the ( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Госдепартамент США назвал оккупацию территории Сирии израильскими войсками «событием».
Reply
Reply
Оговорка, конечно, тоже шикарная - стабильности нигде не хватает. Но Израиль хотя бы на этот раз предупредил о планах, пришлось консультировать. Так что мероприятие совместное, пусть г-н Миллер пока и не готов to speak to the contents of those private diplomatic conversations.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Это вообще наважно. Укоризненные взоры были бы уместны если бы американцы утверждали что придерживаются закона. Но они на это и не претендуют, постулируя rule based world.
Reply
Reply
Ничего, Трамп придëт, порядок наведëт. Признает территориальные приобретения Израиля и не нужно будет перевода. Вероятно.
Reply
Reply
В любом случае воспринимать их всерьёз сложно.
Reply
QUESTION: Can I just ask about another neighbor, Israel? Israel has said that, for instance, this is the first time since the aftermath of the Yom Kippur War it has openly gone across the Golan Heights and said it’s creating what it calls a temporary buffer zone. How do you feel about this? I mean, the UN has said that it’s a violation. Does the United States agree? First of all, does the U.S. agree that it’s a violation?
В общем, не отрицал, что нарушение имеет место быть. Но оправдывает "расширение буферной зоны" всякими potentially ... that could ... that would и обещаниями Израиля что это временно.
Reply
Leave a comment