Alright inks, I now have you comfortably under my belt. Unfortunately, like all other traditional medium, you are terribly time consuming and inefficient compared to that of digital medium. If it wasn't clear to me before--why commercial artists under tight deadlines use digital medium, it is now
(
Read more... )
Comments 12
...Maybe you should keep it that way so your head don't go all s'plody.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
when you consider http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/2388/digicharat.jpg and http://www.alice-in-wonderland.net/alicepic/disney-movie/alice-24.jpg which one has the more realistic proportions ;]
It's a common misconception.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
But the thing is, why does a style need a name, anyways--especially when you think of how all encompassing and terribly misleading the term 'anime' can be?
It baffles me somewhat :9
Reply
Reply
I agree that styles can't really be named, though; the lines are insanely blurry. I've seen mangaka who draw their humans almost photorealistic (it's a fairly old-school technique--Crying Freeman, for example, has some extremely realistic art) and Western artists who stylise their bodies almost precisely the same way Japanese artists do, so what then?
And then there are people who insist on calling shows like Avatar: The Last Airbender "anime"...despite the fact that it's produced almost entirely in America with some animating done in Korea...and the fact it hardly even looks animesque... .___.
Reply
Leave a comment