So some guy gets a shorter prison sentence because the 10 year old girl he raped looked more like she was 16 years old, the judge says
( Read more... )
The he didn't actually 'rape' her - she consented to the sex, but because she was under 13 it still has to be classed as 'rape.' But she was already sexually experience and went out looking for sex - she told him she was over 16, and she looked over 16. When he found out she was only 10 he was 'visibly distraught.'
He had sex with a girl he thought was 16+, and then she turned out to be 10. It's not the same as preying outside the school gates and raping a ten-year-old.
Comments 2
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/south_west/6527625.stm
The he didn't actually 'rape' her - she consented to the sex, but because she was under 13 it still has to be classed as 'rape.' But she was already sexually experience and went out looking for sex - she told him she was over 16, and she looked over 16. When he found out she was only 10 he was 'visibly distraught.'
He had sex with a girl he thought was 16+, and then she turned out to be 10. It's not the same as preying outside the school gates and raping a ten-year-old.
Reply
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6237480.stm
then I agree with you...
Reply
Leave a comment