realistic?

Mar 07, 2009 22:23

Kiwak! Kerje macam full-timer last month tapi gaji tetap sama.
Read more... )

rambles, starbucks

Leave a comment

Comments 6

lalachicka March 7 2009, 15:10:45 UTC
gaji mcm siak kan.

and the shit is, STARBUCKS SHOULD STOP HIRING PEOPLE SIA! IT'S NOT HELPING THEY ARE HIRING MORE PARTNERS, BUT CUTTING OUR HOURS.

bodoh pey orang atas, betul pey bodoh! :)

Reply

beanutputter March 7 2009, 15:37:35 UTC
Tu ah aku terkejut berok biler nampak that MEAGRE amount!

...unless there are alot of ppl quitting?

SIGH. I still can't get over the fact that I only got that much for last month sey. AND IF ONLY CPF DIDN'T CUT 20% OF OUR PAY!!!

Reply

lalachicka March 7 2009, 15:52:13 UTC
i don't think people are quitting. everyone is like fighting for shifts. mcm wth!

cpf 2% pun ok kan. hhes

Reply

beanutputter March 7 2009, 16:15:43 UTC
HAHAHA tell me about it man! It always happen in Wisma.

Takde CPF lagi gerek! Haha

Reply


inxherxeyes March 7 2009, 16:14:00 UTC
actually i like it that you're rambling in malay. makes it funny to read. well, its funny hw the pay still remains the same if you work more. anyway, my starbucks pay is usually $100 for 2 shifts i work.

and well that comes to the question, why are they still hiring?

new hire are cheap compared to old timer. =)

Reply

beanutputter March 7 2009, 16:24:59 UTC
Haha okaaaaay! Yes exactly, I still don't get it.

But wouldn't your labour cost more if you hire more PT when they're quite a handful of old PT..? And when some store are lacking of partners, I'm sure other stores are willing to send their partners for attachment? Then, SB no need to hire new PT...

I don't know if I made any sense but I hope you get the gist....

Reply


Leave a comment

Up