Love there that's sleeping

Aug 15, 2011 14:19

Title: Love there that's sleeping

Pairings: Paul/George as dysfunctional brothers; George/Ringo friendship; John/Paul implied

Rating: PG 13

Warnings: Cursing; events not in linear, chronological order (but as George remembers them)

Summary: George and Paul through the years.

Disclaimer: Everything is fiction and unowned by yours truly. Title ( Read more... )

paul/george

Leave a comment

Comments 22

madorad August 15 2011, 17:25:45 UTC
Oh, geez! This was amazing! I've been thinking about a lot of these events in the same way. Especially how Paul and George never seem to remember meeting each other or getting together again. Which I think is kinda cute, as if they'd always just be there for each other.
I love all the detail, especially when George tells Paul about his mother having a tumor. How you express all the emotion there. Also, the few things not a lot of people notice or would pay much attention to, like sharing the lead vocals, who plays what in the song, and the two beetles on Paul's album.
Great job, I loved it very much. :)

Reply

selenak August 15 2011, 17:58:24 UTC
George and Paul just seem to have slipped into each other's lives, like family who is always there (you don't remember the first time you see your siblings, unless they're really very much younger or older), don't they?

Glad you enjoyed the story, thank you for commenting!

Reply


larainefan August 15 2011, 17:43:39 UTC
Wow, thank you so much for writing this, it's so excellent!!!

Such as how you contrast Paul remembering meeting John, whereas George and Paul don't quite remember their meeting.

Poor Georgie and school! These sentences especially summed that up:
and suddenly the prospect of yet another dreary day in school where he hates all the teachers and is convinced they hate him isn’t quite as bad anymore.

Maybe it’s because Paul doesn’t doubt for a moment he’ll be welcome whereever he goes, while George is not. George is convinced half of the world consists of phoneys who are just out to get you, and they’ll probably be in the cinema as well, so he tries telling himself he won’t miss anything. It doesn’t work too well, and he slinks a bit further into his seat, feeling utterly miserable. George comes across as so paranoid, but that perfectly captures the tragi-comedy of school-age angst, especially for bright but shy and socially awkward kids ( ... )

Reply

selenak August 15 2011, 17:56:09 UTC
Thank you for the lovely feedback. You're such a great George expert that I am extra glad you like the story.

George and school: "tragi-comedy of school-age angst" is an excellent way to sum it up. (Also, I was thinking of the way Paul's brother Mike described him in a 1965 article about their childhood and teenage years (Mike, like Paul and George, was at the Liverpool Institute): One of his new (i.e. Paul's) friends was George Harrison, who at this time was a bit of a joke at school because he wore his hair so long. And the more the kids laughed and jeered, the longer George let his hair grow. I think in the end he'd have let it grow below his knees if they hadn't all got fed up and left off jeering at him.

Glad the Taxman solo flub explanation made sense; it was the most psychologically sound I could think of.

the poignancy of him telling Paul about Louise's brain tumourFinding out that Louise was diagnosed while the Abbey Road sessions were still going on and that George did tell Paul first was what started this entire fic, ( ... )

Reply


dashall August 15 2011, 19:44:51 UTC
Okay. Okay. Good god, where do I begin ( ... )

Reply

selenak August 16 2011, 04:49:19 UTC
That was amazing feedback, thank you!

re: Paul - either Colin Hanton or Erik Griffiths, one of the Quarrymen anyway is quoted with the "Paul McCartney, so effortlessy good at everything that you wanted to hate him" description, and iny my own take that you quoted I was slightly paraphrasing a description Simon Callow gives of young Orson Welles, saying the most remarkable thing about Welles as a child, teenager and young man wasn't just the fiendish multitalentedness but the utter fearlessness in new company, the way he never seems to have doubted people would like him and he would be doing fine in new situations, just bypassing teenage fearfulness and angst. I think that is true of Paul without qualifications only until and including India in 1968, though. The later 1968 till ca. 1973 (Band on the Run period) time frame is one relentless battery and removal of pretty much everything he used to define himself by, from the band and the partnership with John to approval by critics and public, and I don't think his self confidence ever ( ... )

Reply

dashall August 16 2011, 14:13:09 UTC
Oh wow, I can't even... shit, man, you know so much more about the Beatles than I do, I feel like I don't have any right to be reviewing this at all.

Oh, I see why you didn't include the hand stroking bit. I gotcha. Thanks for explaining, man.

Reply

selenak August 16 2011, 16:14:47 UTC
Nonsense. Anyone who passionately cares about a subject (which you clearly do re: Beatles) has the right to review texts inspired by it! Also, such great emotional feedback as yours inspires one to write more stories!

And you're welcome.

Reply


grl_in_red August 16 2011, 04:39:00 UTC
Awwwww... I literally can't stop saying that in my head right now... sooo sweet there at the end, and the rest of it, even/especially the sad/bitter/angry parts, was SO RIGHT. Seriously, you have Paul and George down to a fine art. And I can't stop admiring your Paul, who really and truly is difficult to pin down in fic and make real. You did it though. Wonderful ( ... )

Reply

selenak August 16 2011, 05:24:02 UTC
Well, the encouragement you gave me was instrumental for going from "there is this one scene featuring George and Paul I want to write" to "hell, I'll write a story about the entire George & Paul relationship!" Which as you know fascinates me.

The Taxman sequence - yes, she says sadistically, heartbreak on George's behalf was totally the goal. (Not least because one has to understand where George is coming from in the HDYS sessions.) It's based on Geoff Emerick's description which, much as I like Geoff, make you cringe because he's so oblivious to what "There was a bit of a tension in that session because George had a great deal of trouble playing the solo (...). So George Martin went into the studio and, as diplomatically as possible, announced that he wanted Paul to have a go at the solo instead. (...) Paul's solo was stunning in its ferocity (...) and was accomplished in just a take or two. It was so good, in fact, that George Martin had me fly it in again during the song's fadeout" must have felt like to George. And then it ( ... )

Reply

grl_in_red August 16 2011, 05:50:35 UTC
Haha glad I could be your enabler in that way. xD I will claim any credit I can get my hands on!

Oh yes, I remember that part in Geoff's book... and you're right, he's just so completely oblivious to how that (obviously!) must have negatively affected George. He's just such a Paul-fan, which is fine, but it explains some things. Also, yeah you're so right that people would have complimented George on the guitar solo and OH yeah... salt in the wound indeed.

Paul + kids = total cuteness, always.

I remember reading that story, but I don't quite REMEMBER. xD I do think, however, that telling the HDYS story from George's POV was such a great way to do it originally, and especially the way you told it.

Reply

selenak August 16 2011, 09:23:54 UTC
The tale in question.

I imagine the worst case scenario re: compliments for George was probably this one:

Admirer: "George, I just saw Let it Be, and really, what an arrogant ass Paul must be to imagine he could tell you how to play guitar! You're such a great lead guitar player, one of the best in the world! That solo in Taxman alone..."

Reply


lennon_jok August 18 2011, 09:06:19 UTC
what a fucking good writer you are!! seriously!!

first things first, whats this about the cake fight at patti and eric's wedding? is that true? i havent heard it before!!

loved loved LOVED this bit:

"It is unworthy behaviour, and he should know better. He does know better. He would never behave this way with Ravi, or Eric, or Bob, all of whom know the George he wants to be, see the George he wants to be, as opposed to Paul who keeps seeing only the George he used to be. But right now there is freedom in that, because there is no dignity to be lost with Paul, no respect, and so George cries without shame or attempt at spiritual equanimity, curses and shakes while Paul whispers “that’s bullshit, George”, holds on and doesn’t let go."

it's so perfectly summed up and true. well done, man, shit.

yeah, just sooo good. you must write more.

the 'taxman' story is an odd one, because both paul and george insist that george ASKED paul to do the guitar solo. but it's george martin that says otherwise, right?

Reply

selenak August 18 2011, 12:02:46 UTC
George Martin and Geoff Emerick (their engineer from Revolver onwards) both. In this particular case, I tend to believe their recollections most; I think both George and Paul are emotionally invested in making that memory less painful in retrospect.

Cake fight: from Pattie's book, Wonderful Tonight. She's also the source for the story about Paul playing with her bored little brothers at the wedding and the arrow ending up in his car. The cake fight wasn't just Paul and George, it was all three former Beatles and Eric and started by Eric.

Also , thank you for the feedback!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up