Harry and Voldemort: a correction?

Jul 01, 2005 14:14

Last time I did this, it was to argue that Remus was evil, and that was Moony’s fault as well.

The following contains references to all five books, and under the cut is an extract from JKR’s website and an analysis of the American cover of HBP that may be construed, for the very paranoid, as spoilers. You have been warned.

This sacrifice turned ( Read more... )

books - hbp, fandom - hp, that occasional intelligence

Leave a comment

Comments 8

vodka_at_sea July 1 2005, 04:47:40 UTC
That's a pretty damn good theory. I'd never really thought that much about how information existed in the pensieve. I don't feel this point was really explored or brought to attention, even though it was always evident. In the past, that's been a sign that such seemingly ignored objects or powers were going to be explored later in greater detail.

Reply


i_like_soap July 1 2005, 06:37:45 UTC
That is as good a theory as any I've heard. It's a lot better than my fairly simplistic "Dumbly dies" theory/hope. Unfortunately, it means Harry and Dumble talk.

But seriously, I very much like the theory, I was unaware they were looking in a pensieve.

Reply


tassinar July 1 2005, 06:57:38 UTC
Dananananananana nananananananana FORCE FIELD!

Reply


fluffyllama July 1 2005, 07:45:57 UTC
Ooh yes, that would really explain the green glow around the pensieve! If that's what it is, of course (and I think it is).

Reply


innerbrat July 1 2005, 10:29:30 UTC
I think it's interesting that the US covers to contain so much information onf the content of the book. I just lookes at them on Amazon, and there's a giant rutting snake on the cover of CoS! *headdesks*

So yes, your theory is good. I like it.

Kinda interested in seeing what you think of the book on the UK Adults edition.

Reply

bentley July 1 2005, 12:27:27 UTC
Thankyou! :D The covers are kind of injokes; you don't really "get" them until you've read the book. But they're fun to speculate about ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up