Am I the only one who's retarded and doesn't see a huge difference between 1 and 2? They seem to be designed in a similar way, and only the photography makes them look different. I like the design of the chairs in 1 better than 2, but the table looks exactly the same to me. But like I said, I'm probably just be being retarded.
While I generally prefer wood furniture, I do think option 3's chairs are designed much sexier than 1 or 2. But that really depends on the kind of decor that the room has. I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.
The only big differences are A) the manufacturer and B) the chair backs :) You're right about the tables being essentially identical. (I think there's also a $40 difference--the second option being more expensive.)
I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.
Ha! I only wish my apartment were that sexy :) It couldn't be further from the accurate description (except for the kitchen sink which is, in fact, coated with a very dark brown enamel).
Comments 11
While I generally prefer wood furniture, I do think option 3's chairs are designed much sexier than 1 or 2. But that really depends on the kind of decor that the room has. I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.
Reply
Reply
I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.
Ha! I only wish my apartment were that sexy :) It couldn't be further from the accurate description (except for the kitchen sink which is, in fact, coated with a very dark brown enamel).
Reply
Leave a comment