On cheap tables

Mar 27, 2008 14:09

It's time to buy a kitchen table! If you have any thoughts about the following options (listed in no particular order), please share them.

Option 1:

Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 11

bonzaineko March 28 2008, 15:25:12 UTC
Am I the only one who's retarded and doesn't see a huge difference between 1 and 2? They seem to be designed in a similar way, and only the photography makes them look different. I like the design of the chairs in 1 better than 2, but the table looks exactly the same to me. But like I said, I'm probably just be being retarded.

While I generally prefer wood furniture, I do think option 3's chairs are designed much sexier than 1 or 2. But that really depends on the kind of decor that the room has. I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.

Reply

preservationgal March 28 2008, 15:37:46 UTC
I don't see a huge difference between 1 and 2 either.

Reply

bertie_girl March 28 2008, 18:06:30 UTC
The only big differences are A) the manufacturer and B) the chair backs :) You're right about the tables being essentially identical. (I think there's also a $40 difference--the second option being more expensive.)

I'm imagining a city apartment with walls painted in bold earth tones, softer lighting, lots of colors.

Ha! I only wish my apartment were that sexy :) It couldn't be further from the accurate description (except for the kitchen sink which is, in fact, coated with a very dark brown enamel).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up