for yea, verily, it is useless. Leaving aside the first one having turned up broken due to inadequate packaging on the supplier side, its replacement has just had its lid fail for the second time and thus will be returned with a note mentioning the phrase "not fit for purpose
(
Read more... )
Comments 16
(The comment has been removed)
My parents have had two ice-cream makers in their time ...
1) ... was of the frozen-bowl kind, and worked rather well. The beater is attached to the lid, the motor rotates the bowl. Worked rather well, until the motor eventually died, IIRC.
2) ... bought by my father, incorporated its' own freezer mechanism, and nothing needed to go into the freezer. Unfortunately, as a result, it was so heavy that my mum couldn't lift it down from the shelf it lived on, so it didn't really get used. Another fine sample of paternal purchasing.
Reply
If I had the storage space for the has-its-own-freezer type I'd be there in a shot, but all of those seem to start at "big" (and indeed "expensive") and work up to "yes, of course I want to make 2 litres of icecream an hour" and "arm, leg and various internal organs" for price.
Reply
And yes, my parents have somewhat different approaches to shopping. My mother will research the subject, draw up a list of required features, identify the options, then buy the cheapest one that she can find that has all those features and is from a reputable source. My dad goes out with a credit card and comes back a little while later with something that usually, in at least one way, isn't suitable. [grin]
Reply
It might depend on the recipe/mix of ingredients, though.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Debating what to get as a replacement... one of the has-its-own-freezer types is oh so very tempting, but (a) about five times the price and (b) I don't have infinite storage space (quite).
Reply
You could always get an extension built? [grins and runs]
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment