Aurora... yea... I'd spin her wheel alrightcaptain4n6April 28 2004, 12:48:59 UTC
That paper is... fucked up. It really is. I can totally see the connection, but what of it? Does this mean that all midgets are also embalmers? (Snow White) And that step-parents drive children into the mouths of witches (Hansel and Gretel). And that women are completely inferior to men (Every book ever written)?
Ok... that's reasonable. I'll be here... being superior to all women.
Keep it real, and stick with the live ones. They're a lot more fun...
Re: Aurora... yea... I'd spin her wheel alrightbioeuphApril 28 2004, 19:00:44 UTC
Yes, little people (let's be PC) are also embalmers. Women are helpless. And "Open to Interpretation" is a great script. :)
This point was brought up to show that the idea is not that hard of a concept to grasp. If we can take this children's story and apply the idea of Prince Charming being this amazingly great guy, with his huge...ummm, sword...umm yea...umm, ready to sweep someone of her (or his...again the PCness) feet. Then why cannot it be used to show that necrophilia is more common place than we may want to admit.
I would say more, but I have to go sprinkle Grandma with some cologne. She is starting to stank up the dorm room...
Necrophilia is alright with me...captain4n6April 28 2004, 19:50:14 UTC
but "Open to Interpretation" SUCKED!!
Sucked balls- big, juicy, hairy, black, 86 year old balls.
Seriously, where is the character growth/development? Is there any driving conflict in the piece? Not that I can recall. Every version I've seen was simply two kids going up to the front of the room and being silly- performing canned stereotypes for cheap laughs. I've not seen a version where I was convinced that the actors thought that they were portraying a character, usually it was just kids trying to get visitor/novice laughs and maybe win a medal. Not trying anything risky, not growing into their character... not acting....
No, 'Open to Interpretation' is quite the opposite of a good script. And I shall say good day to you sir.
Comments 3
Ok... that's reasonable. I'll be here... being superior to all women.
Keep it real, and stick with the live ones. They're a lot more fun...
Reply
This point was brought up to show that the idea is not that hard of a concept to grasp. If we can take this children's story and apply the idea of Prince Charming being this amazingly great guy, with his huge...ummm, sword...umm yea...umm, ready to sweep someone of her (or his...again the PCness) feet. Then why cannot it be used to show that necrophilia is more common place than we may want to admit.
I would say more, but I have to go sprinkle Grandma with some cologne. She is starting to stank up the dorm room...
Reply
Sucked balls- big, juicy, hairy, black, 86 year old balls.
Seriously, where is the character growth/development? Is there any driving conflict in the piece? Not that I can recall. Every version I've seen was simply two kids going up to the front of the room and being silly- performing canned stereotypes for cheap laughs. I've not seen a version where I was convinced that the actors thought that they were portraying a character, usually it was just kids trying to get visitor/novice laughs and maybe win a medal. Not trying anything risky, not growing into their character... not acting....
No, 'Open to Interpretation' is quite the opposite of a good script. And I shall say good day to you sir.
Reply
Leave a comment